And the Spirit & the bride say, come.... Reveaaltion 22:17

And the Spirit & the bride say, come.... Reveaaltion 22:17
And the Spirit & the bride say, come...Revelation 22:17 - May We One Day Bow Down In The DUST At HIS FEET ...... {click on blog TITLE at top to refresh page}---QUESTION: ...when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth? LUKE 18:8

Monday, January 10, 2022

Creation Moment 1/11/2022 - a 3rd Option

"Secular scientists knew from their models of stellar evolution that the young sun would have given off 30% less heat when the Earth was assumed to be forming. 
 
This “faint young sun paradox” led them to worry about Earth forming as an ice ball, never able to melt into today’s habitable paradise. The new model suggests an opposite outcome: the Earth narrowly escaped a similar fate to that of Venus.

Furthermore, this shows that the formation of Earth’s oceans required much lower insolation than today, which was made possible by the faint young Sun. This also implies the existence of another stability state for present-day Earth: the ‘steam Earth’, with all the water from the oceans evaporated into the atmosphere.

A press release from the University of Switzerland at Bern explains that even less insolation at the birth of our home could have led to a steam-house Earth. The real bad news, however, is the realization that models are unreliable. Previous models gave the complete opposite prediction. Co-author Emeline Bolmont remarks,

this is a complete reversal in the way we look at what has

long been called the ‘Faint Young Sun paradox’. It has always been considered as a major obstacle to the appearance of life on Earth! ” The argument was that if the Sun’s radiation was much weaker than today, it would have turned the Earth into a ball of ice hostile to life. “But it turns out that for the young, very hot Earth, this weak Sun may have in fact been an unhoped-for opportunity,” continues the researcher.

Q: So was the ice-ball Earth a scientific truth before this model was published? 

Q: Or is this new model now the truth? How could one ever be sure without a time machine to go back and see what the young Earth and Venus were like when they formed? 

--Computers and simulations are not time machines. 
--They are totally dependent on the input and the assumptions programmed into them. 
This means that another university’s researchers could some day produce a different model with different assumptions that comes up with different conclusions from these. After all, the previous two models, looking at the same planet with the same data, completely contradicted each other.
 
Even if futurists could build time machines, they might hit a wall
trying to go back before 6,000 BC."
CEH 
Here's a 3rd option that fits better---- Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God.... Hebrews 11:3