... they ceased not from their own doings, nor from their stubborn way. Judges 2:19
"Matthew Haber at the University of Utah proposes “the rejection of absolute biological history, the idea that there is an invariant, privileged biological history against which other histories are measured or deviate from.” Our comment, “If one says that something isn’t real, and yet we can know it — not far down that road lies utter incomprehension.” Haber calls it “biology’s Einstein moment,” but it feels more like a surreal state.
Now along comes a new video from New Scientist instructing us that “The Human Family Tree Has No Beginning.” No biological history and no biological beginning: Q: Are you seeing the trend? Both seem to be responses to being battered by evidence undermining ideas of universal common descent.
There is much doubt in the academic world these days, at a pretty fundamental level. Recently, for example, it came out that there is very little agreement among theoretical physicists about whether the basic facts of our universe imply anything about its origins.
That’s a sobering finding — all the new information over the past century did not result in a growing consensus among cosmologists." MindMatters