And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2 Thessalonians 2:11
WOW--THIS IS SCARY.... these people are ACTUALLY experimenting with an internet so-called VACCINE to SHAPE PUBLIC OPINION....in this case, although they claim to counter "fake news" on climate change, we know they really mean forcing people to think the way they do on the topic...who decides what is "fake news"? Any criticism of man made climate change? THIS IS SCARY...Imagine what they could do wit this for propaganda for a GREEN counterfeit Sabbath...and what someone could do with this for other aspects for promoting the mark of the beast--or anything else......THINK ABOUT THE ARROGANCE OF THESE SCIENTIST TO EVEN THINK OF, LET ALONE EXPERIMENT, WITH SOMETHING LIKE THIS. WHO ARE THEY TO DECIDE WHAT YOU ARE TO BELIEVE. Remember, these people don't really mean "fake News", they mean anyone who challenges their position. Think would they could do if they targeted the creation vs. evolution debate, LGBT debate, Religion, Politics, etc...TALK ABOUT MIND CONTROL....These people are OBSESSED with the MYTH of man-made climate change, even experimenting in mind control with NO SHAME in the public arena to their Fascist-like thoughts....GREEN NAZIS
Now add this to the issue of Hypercoherence (see Link Below) and picture these 2 things, hypercoherence & this Psychological 'vaccine' in the hands of the Little Horn via the world wide web...wow....
http://master1844-dc.blogspot.com/2017/01/hypercoherence-end-times.html
"Psychological 'vaccine' could help immunize public against 'fake news' on climate change...
In medicine, vaccinating against a virus involves exposing a body to a weakened version of the threat, enough to build a tolerance.
A new study compared reactions to a well-known climate change fact with those to a popular misinformation campaign. When presented consecutively, the false material completely cancelled out the accurate statement in people's minds - opinions ended up back where they started.
Researchers then added a small dose of misinformation to delivery of the climate change fact, by briefly introducing people to distortion tactics used by certain groups. This "inoculation" helped shift and hold opinions closer to the truth - despite the follow-up exposure to 'fake news'.
The study on US attitudes found the inoculation technique shifted the climate change opinions of Republicans, Independents and Democrats alike.
Published in the journal Global Challenges, the study was conducted by researchers from the universities of Cambridge, UK, Yale and George Mason, US. It is one of the first on 'inoculation theory' to try and replicate a 'real world' scenario of conflicting information on a highly politicised subject.
"Misinformation can be sticky, spreading and replicating like a virus," says lead author Dr Sander van der Linden, a social psychologist from the University of Cambridge and Director of the Cambridge Social Decision-Making Lab.
"We wanted to see if we could find a 'vaccine' by pre-emptively exposing people to a small amount of the type of misinformation they might experience. A warning that helps preserve the facts.
"The idea is to provide a cognitive repertoire that helps build up resistance to misinformation, so the next time people come across it they are less susceptible." PHYS.Org
