Creation Moment 10/26/2013 - Circular Reasoning of Dawkins

Knowing what it must have been because we are here & 
because your theory says it is how we got here, and since
we are here, it must be true-ISN'T SCIENCE---
it's called CIRCULAR REASONING

"We have no evidence about what the first step in making life was, but we do know what the kind of step must have been. It must have been whatever it took to get natural selection started."
the greatest show on earth Richard Dawkins p.419
1) He admits they have NO evidence for the beginning of their theory of origins
2) If they have NO evidence for how it all started-then wouldn't all the rest of evolution be guess work?
3) If #2 is true--& logically it is based upon #1--then why teach it as fact in our school systems? Why teach OPINION as science?
4) Also, how do they know what the "kind of step must have been"? Isn't that called CIRCULAR REASONING when they say that? If they pulled that stunt in any other field they would be laughed off the stage....
5) "It must have been whatever it took"...leaves wide open a massive door for ANY interpretation or guesswork on their part--how convenient...
So in SUMMARY: They don't know what their talking about--they are in essence making the whole thing up---always pay CLOSE attention to what an evolutionists says--because they really make no sense.