a) They claim it was written to the "Jews" scattered abroad. But we know from Paul that it would mean the Christians, the new spiritual "Jews".
b) They claim, erroneously, that James contradicts Paul. They believe that James taught salvation by works (false).
c) Some are more clever & tricky, claiming that James should be considered historical rather than for doctrinal formation. (But the WHOLE BIBLE should be studied for doctrinal formation-which would include James).
My response is simple:
1) There is NO contradiction between James & Paul - you have some who simply misinterpret Paul. even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
2 Peter 3:15,16
2) BEWARE anyone who tries to diminish--or take scissors---to parts of the Bible because it contradicts THEIR doctrine. The problem isn't between the books of James & Paul---the problem is the interpretation by some. If YOU find what YOU believe to be a doctrinal contradiction in Scripture, the problem isn't the Holy Writ....the problem is your interpretation...
For precept must be upon precept,
precept upon precept;
line upon line,
line upon line;
here a little, and there a little:
Isaiah 28:10
3) As for trying to separate Scripture for "historical" Vs."doctrinal" use... All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 2 Timothy 3:16
