Hebrews 8:6
But now has He obtained a more excellent ministry
[than theirs], by how much also He is the mediator of a better covenant [than theirs].
And the Spirit & the bride say, come.... Reveaaltion 22:17
And the Spirit & the bride say, come...Revelation 22:17 - May We One Day Bow Down In The DUST At HIS FEET ...... {click on blog TITLE at top to refresh page}---QUESTION: ...when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth? LUKE 18:8
Tuesday, November 4, 2025
Creation Moment 11/5/2025 - What about the "out-of-sequence" fossils debate?
...., the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. Genesis 7:11
"Evolutionists would say there are no out-of-sequence fossils. They would claim that the fragmentary nature of the fossil record means that we don’t have a good idea of the entire period a fossil belongs in. So if we find a fossil in a stratum that is supposed to be 100 million years older than the species (using evolutionary dating for the sake of the argument), it simply means that it evolved 100 million years earlier than we thought.
Another indication that the evolutionary story is flawed is the huge number of living fossils. That is, creatures that have been found in the fossil record have been assigned ages of hundreds of millions of years, yet are identical to creatures alive today.
In the Cambrian rocks (some of the alleged oldest complex-fossil-bearing rocks on earth—c. 500 plus myo), ‘index’ fossils of just about every major phylum can be found. Because next to no ancestors of these organisms appears below them, that is, they appear suddenly and simultaneously in the fossil record; it has long been a massive problem for evolutionists.
"Evolutionists would say there are no out-of-sequence fossils. They would claim that the fragmentary nature of the fossil record means that we don’t have a good idea of the entire period a fossil belongs in. So if we find a fossil in a stratum that is supposed to be 100 million years older than the species (using evolutionary dating for the sake of the argument), it simply means that it evolved 100 million years earlier than we thought.
The evolutionary interpretation of the fossil record is so flexible that it can incorporate virtually any new change, no matter how unexpected. In other words, if an out-of-order fossil is found (according to their standard view), then it is just incorporated as new evidence to provide a better understanding of evolution! In short, evolution is assumed and then used to explain the fossils. So, no matter what we find, by the very nature of the way they interpret the facts, nothing would falsify evolution anyway!
So a better way to counter this would be to ask whether evolution has made predictions about the fossil record that have been confirmed or otherwise by subsequent discoveries.
So a better way to counter this would be to ask whether evolution has made predictions about the fossil record that have been confirmed or otherwise by subsequent discoveries.
And by this measure evolution falls dramatically short. For instance, Charles Darwin said that “no organism wholly soft can be preserved.”
He was simply wrong, because we have many examples of this.
For instance, hundreds of fossilized jellyfish and a fossilized squid, that look remarkably similar to the same creatures living today. Yet they were claimed to be 505 million years old (myo) and 150 myo respectively. The squid even contained an ink sac so fresh that the ink could be used to paint a picture. The ages assigned to these fossils comes from their position in the alleged geologic column and the dates assigned to the rock layers in which they were found. Remember that it is believed that the rock layers were supposed to have been slowly deposited over millions of years, and similarly, the process of burial and permineralization is supposed to have taken a very long time.
But besides soft-bodied creatures, we have fossils like an ichthyosaur giving birth, and fish in the process of eating other fish, that capture moments in time. They must have been preserved quickly. Logically, if the fossils themselves provide evidence that suggests rapid burial then it only makes sense to presume that the sediments that buried them had to also be deposited quickly.
In reality, there are a lot of fossils that don’t fit within the neatly-defined evolutionary order of things paraded in our geology and biology textbooks:
Trilobites, which are allegedly 500 myo in the Cambrian strata, have eyes that are far too complex for their place in the fossil record. That is, they have no precursors to their appearance.
Perhaps most astonishingly, pollen fossils—evidence of flowering plants—were found in the Precambrian strata. According to evolutionists, flowering plants first evolved 160 mya, but the Precambrian strata is older than 550 mya.
Dinosaurs are supposed to have evolved into birds. But Confuciusornis was a true beaked bird that pre-dates the ‘feathered’ dinosaurs that it allegedly came from. It also has been found in the stomach of a dinosaur.
Grass which has been found in fossilized dinosaur coprolites (fossilized dung). But grass is not supposed to have evolved until at least 10 million years after the dinosaurs went extinct.
A dog-like mammal fossil was found with remains of dinosaurs in its stomach—but no mammals large enough to prey on dinosaurs were supposed to exist alongside them.
In reality, there are a lot of fossils that don’t fit within the neatly-defined evolutionary order of things paraded in our geology and biology textbooks:
Trilobites, which are allegedly 500 myo in the Cambrian strata, have eyes that are far too complex for their place in the fossil record. That is, they have no precursors to their appearance.
Perhaps most astonishingly, pollen fossils—evidence of flowering plants—were found in the Precambrian strata. According to evolutionists, flowering plants first evolved 160 mya, but the Precambrian strata is older than 550 mya.
Dinosaurs are supposed to have evolved into birds. But Confuciusornis was a true beaked bird that pre-dates the ‘feathered’ dinosaurs that it allegedly came from. It also has been found in the stomach of a dinosaur.
Grass which has been found in fossilized dinosaur coprolites (fossilized dung). But grass is not supposed to have evolved until at least 10 million years after the dinosaurs went extinct.
A dog-like mammal fossil was found with remains of dinosaurs in its stomach—but no mammals large enough to prey on dinosaurs were supposed to exist alongside them.
Another indication that the evolutionary story is flawed is the huge number of living fossils. That is, creatures that have been found in the fossil record have been assigned ages of hundreds of millions of years, yet are identical to creatures alive today.
In the Cambrian rocks (some of the alleged oldest complex-fossil-bearing rocks on earth—c. 500 plus myo), ‘index’ fossils of just about every major phylum can be found. Because next to no ancestors of these organisms appears below them, that is, they appear suddenly and simultaneously in the fossil record; it has long been a massive problem for evolutionists.
As there is no smooth and gradual sequence to the appearance of these fossils, one could argue that the millions of creatures that represent the Cambrian explosion are out-of-sequence fossils by the evolutionists ‘own measure’."
CMI
Monday, November 3, 2025
The Melchizedek Priesthood SERIES: INFIRMITY, PERFECTION
Hebrews 7:28 For the law makes men high priests which have infirmity; but the word of the oath which was since the law, makes the Son who is consecrated [margin: perfected] for evermore.
IN the NEWS - Climate Financer Bill Gates Backtracks
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
James 1:8
"In the late 1970s, after 'global cooling' armageddon science fell out of fashion, a well-oiled machine comprised of billionaire-funded NGOs, the MSM, Hollywood, woke Wall Street, and a robust fact-
checking / censorship cartel - started pushing a cult narrative about the planet's imminent demise in a hellish inferno of global warming.
They've blamed everything from cow farts and Taylor Swift's private jet to two-stroke chainsaws, petrol-powered cars, and whatever else these climate Marxists wanted banned - and forced people into authoritarianism like 'electric stoves only' and '15 minute cities' and 'eat the bugs,' etc.
Now, as data centers are coincidentally projected to need record amounts of electricity,
Bill Gates has changed his mind about all of that.
And of course the climate cult was one giant grift - or as one former DOGE worker put it, "a heist on the U.S. Treasury" carried out through propaganda that allowed 'virtuous' climate bills to be passed easily.
Today, Bill Gates admitted that pushing climate doomerism was a mistake. @LLBiggers: “That shift to common sense is welcome, but it comes after decades of fearmongering that harmed young people, stalled development, and punished dissenting scientists."
ZeroHedge
Creation Moment 11/4/2025 - Pseudogenes OR Purposeful Code?
And God saw every thing that He had made, and, behold, it was very good. Genesis 1:31
"One of the past arguments for evidence of biological evolution in the genome has been the concept of pseudogenes. These DNA sequences were once thought to be the defunct remnants of genes, representing nothing but mutated genomic “fossils” in the genomes of plants, animals, and humans.
"One of the past arguments for evidence of biological evolution in the genome has been the concept of pseudogenes. These DNA sequences were once thought to be the defunct remnants of genes, representing nothing but mutated genomic “fossils” in the genomes of plants, animals, and humans.
*However, much research has been published over the past several decades showing that pseudogenes are not only functional but key to organism survival.
Pseudogenes come in three different forms depending on their DNA sequence characteristics. The group of pseudogenes that has the largest representation in the human genome is what is called a processed pseudogene (also called a retrogene). There are about 10,000 of these in humans, and this category is also the most highly studied for functionality.
It has been postulated by evolutionists that these processed pseudogenes were derived from an mRNA copy of a protein-coding gene that had its intervening sequences (introns) spliced out, which were then retro-transcribed into DNA and inserted back into the genome—hence the moniker “processed.”
Pseudogenes come in three different forms depending on their DNA sequence characteristics. The group of pseudogenes that has the largest representation in the human genome is what is called a processed pseudogene (also called a retrogene). There are about 10,000 of these in humans, and this category is also the most highly studied for functionality.
It has been postulated by evolutionists that these processed pseudogenes were derived from an mRNA copy of a protein-coding gene that had its intervening sequences (introns) spliced out, which were then retro-transcribed into DNA and inserted back into the genome—hence the moniker “processed.”
Conventional scientists believe that this is why these types of pseudogenes lack introns and, in most cases, a promoter region similar to that of its protein-coding counterpart. In addition, a processed pseudogene is almost always located on a different chromosome than its alleged parent gene. Despite the seemingly accidental structure of these genes, many of them are being shown to have important functionality, including some with introns that also exhibit functionality.
A second category of pseudogenes are duplicated pseudogenes. These are believed to have been duplicated from a parent gene since they contain promoters and introns but have alterations in their DNA code that keep them from producing a protein.
A second category of pseudogenes are duplicated pseudogenes. These are believed to have been duplicated from a parent gene since they contain promoters and introns but have alterations in their DNA code that keep them from producing a protein.
Conventional scientists believe that these may have been derived during DNA replication due to an unequal crossing-over event during meiosis. However, this is pure speculation just as in the case of processed pseudogenes. In fact, this hypothetical explanation is even employed for the development of large gene families that do not include pseudogenes.
The third category of pseudogenes is rare in the genome and called a unitary pseudogene. These don’t necessarily have an obvious parent from which they are derived. Although, if they are part of a gene family, duplication will often be invoked as an evolutionary meme. These types of genes will often have DNA code alterations that prohibit a protein from being produced and are in most cases considered to be broken genes. However, the human beta-globin pseudogene, which was once considered to be a broken gene, has actually now been shown to be highly functional by producing long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that help regulate the entire beta-globin gene network. Furthermore, this gene is highly intolerant of mutations, which can cause beta-thalassemia disease pathologies.
Pseudogenes work their functional expertise through a variety of molecular mechanisms and systems. In one of the leading systems, pseudogenes are thought to participate as biological regulators by functioning as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs).
The third category of pseudogenes is rare in the genome and called a unitary pseudogene. These don’t necessarily have an obvious parent from which they are derived. Although, if they are part of a gene family, duplication will often be invoked as an evolutionary meme. These types of genes will often have DNA code alterations that prohibit a protein from being produced and are in most cases considered to be broken genes. However, the human beta-globin pseudogene, which was once considered to be a broken gene, has actually now been shown to be highly functional by producing long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that help regulate the entire beta-globin gene network. Furthermore, this gene is highly intolerant of mutations, which can cause beta-thalassemia disease pathologies.
Pseudogenes work their functional expertise through a variety of molecular mechanisms and systems. In one of the leading systems, pseudogenes are thought to participate as biological regulators by functioning as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs).
In a previous article, I showed that small RNAs called microRNAs (miRNAs) are produced from RNA copies of long DNA sequences (long primary miRNAs) and then are eventually processed into smaller mature miRNAs that are only about 19 to 25 nucleotides long. These miRNAs then bind to other RNA transcripts such as lncRNAs, protein-coding gene transcripts, and pseudogene transcripts at specific target sites called miRNA response elements (MREs). This competitive binding among populations of RNA transcripts and miRNAs is a complicated cellular system of titrating and fine-tuning gene regulation.
Another role of pseudogene function involves interactions between their lncRNAs and proteins. Part of the cell’s biology includesspecialized proteins that bind to RNAs called RNA-binding proteins or RBPs. These RBPs function as key regulators of a variety of posttranscriptional processes, including RNA splicing, transcript stability (protection from degradation), RNA transport to specific cellular addresses, and making proteins from the transcript, which functions as a template (translation). And just as miRNAs competitively function between pseudogenes and their protein-coding counterparts, so do RBPs, which bind to specific RNA-binding domain (RBD) sites on the RNAs. Several studies in humans have shown that proper functioning of pseudogene transcripts regulated by RBPs is key to maintaining healthy insulin levels and keeping cancer at bay.
Yet another fascinating aspect of some pseudogenes is their ability to harbor what are known as small interfering RNAs (siRNA), which are sequences that are processed out of the pseudogene transcripts. I discussed the role of siRNAs in a previous article. These siRNAs can regulate the pseudogene’s protein-coding counterparts by forming specific stem-loop structures that bind to corresponding sites on the transcripts of protein-coding genes, which can repress their activity as another means of gene regulation.
It is nearly impossible to imagine how pseudogene systems this complex could arise by naturalistic processes. And certainly, the term “pseudo” now appears to be a highly inaccurate description of these misunderstood types of genes that are now believed to be almost as plentiful in number as protein-coding genes in the genome. In reality, they are just another class of lncRNA genes. The only logical conclusion is that divine engineering by an omnipotent and wise creator is the source for this amazing biological and purposeful code."
Another role of pseudogene function involves interactions between their lncRNAs and proteins. Part of the cell’s biology includesspecialized proteins that bind to RNAs called RNA-binding proteins or RBPs. These RBPs function as key regulators of a variety of posttranscriptional processes, including RNA splicing, transcript stability (protection from degradation), RNA transport to specific cellular addresses, and making proteins from the transcript, which functions as a template (translation). And just as miRNAs competitively function between pseudogenes and their protein-coding counterparts, so do RBPs, which bind to specific RNA-binding domain (RBD) sites on the RNAs. Several studies in humans have shown that proper functioning of pseudogene transcripts regulated by RBPs is key to maintaining healthy insulin levels and keeping cancer at bay.
Yet another fascinating aspect of some pseudogenes is their ability to harbor what are known as small interfering RNAs (siRNA), which are sequences that are processed out of the pseudogene transcripts. I discussed the role of siRNAs in a previous article. These siRNAs can regulate the pseudogene’s protein-coding counterparts by forming specific stem-loop structures that bind to corresponding sites on the transcripts of protein-coding genes, which can repress their activity as another means of gene regulation.
It is nearly impossible to imagine how pseudogene systems this complex could arise by naturalistic processes. And certainly, the term “pseudo” now appears to be a highly inaccurate description of these misunderstood types of genes that are now believed to be almost as plentiful in number as protein-coding genes in the genome. In reality, they are just another class of lncRNA genes. The only logical conclusion is that divine engineering by an omnipotent and wise creator is the source for this amazing biological and purposeful code."
ICR
Sunday, November 2, 2025
The Melchizedek Priesthood SERIES: DAILY OFFERINGS, ONE OFFERING
Hebrews 7:27 Who needs not daily, as those high priests to offer up
sacrifices, first for His own sins, and then for the people’s; for this He did once when He offered up Himself.
sacrifices, first for His own sins, and then for the people’s; for this He did once when He offered up Himself.
Creation Moment 11/3/2025 - Rapid Radiations
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle
after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:25
"In the most extensive published examination of animal and plant diversification rates to date, Dr John J. Wiens, professor at the University of Arizona, and Dr Daniel Moen, an assistant professor at the University of California Riverside found that “the majority of earth’s species stem from a few evolutionary explosions”. The study published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution examined a taxonomic scope of over 2,000,000 species, from 2,545 families and 17 kingdoms, including over 300,000 species of plants, a million species of insects, over 66,000 species of vertebrates and 1.5 million invertebrates.
Using a “nearly complete” sample comprising of an estimated ~70% of known species (~67% animals, and ~78% vertebrates), the researchers found that “…among the major clades of living organisms and among land plant phyla and animal phyla, >80% of known species richness is contained within the few clades in the upper 90th percentile for diversification rates in each group.” These striking findings led the researchers to the following conclusion:
after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:25
"In the most extensive published examination of animal and plant diversification rates to date, Dr John J. Wiens, professor at the University of Arizona, and Dr Daniel Moen, an assistant professor at the University of California Riverside found that “the majority of earth’s species stem from a few evolutionary explosions”. The study published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution examined a taxonomic scope of over 2,000,000 species, from 2,545 families and 17 kingdoms, including over 300,000 species of plants, a million species of insects, over 66,000 species of vertebrates and 1.5 million invertebrates.
Using a “nearly complete” sample comprising of an estimated ~70% of known species (~67% animals, and ~78% vertebrates), the researchers found that “…among the major clades of living organisms and among land plant phyla and animal phyla, >80% of known species richness is contained within the few clades in the upper 90th percentile for diversification rates in each group.” These striking findings led the researchers to the following conclusion:
“…these results show for the first time that most of the known species’ richness of life is explained by rapid radiations.”
Q: What do these ‘rapid radiations’ mean for evolutionary theory?
A: The Significance of Rapid Radiations: An Affront to Gradualism
Uniformitarian assumptions influence the interpretation of almost all data in the realm of both biological and geological evolution. This long-held interpretation of slow, incremental and continuous change over millions of years, driven by random mutation and natural selection, was made famous by Charles Darwin himself. When Darwin wrote his seminal ‘On the Origin of Species’, he specifically regarded gradualism as a cornerstone of his theory.
Q: What do these ‘rapid radiations’ mean for evolutionary theory?
A: The Significance of Rapid Radiations: An Affront to Gradualism
Uniformitarian assumptions influence the interpretation of almost all data in the realm of both biological and geological evolution. This long-held interpretation of slow, incremental and continuous change over millions of years, driven by random mutation and natural selection, was made famous by Charles Darwin himself. When Darwin wrote his seminal ‘On the Origin of Species’, he specifically regarded gradualism as a cornerstone of his theory.
In his words:
“As natural selection acts solely by accumulating slight, successive, favorable variations, it can produce no great or sudden modifications; it can only act by very short and slow steps.” — Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species (1859)
And again, he wrote:
“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”
***From these quotes, it is evident that Darwin sets a clear testable boundary for his theory: if gradualism fails to explain complexity, then natural selection collapses. This underscores how foundational gradualism was to his evolutionary framework.
However, rapid radiation theory suggests the opposite–that most species emerged in short bursts, not through gradual steady accumulation. If true, this directly undermines uniformitarian assumptions and raises further key questions about the plausibility of theorized evolutionary mechanisms to explain these observations. For instance:
“As natural selection acts solely by accumulating slight, successive, favorable variations, it can produce no great or sudden modifications; it can only act by very short and slow steps.” — Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species (1859)
And again, he wrote:
“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”
***From these quotes, it is evident that Darwin sets a clear testable boundary for his theory: if gradualism fails to explain complexity, then natural selection collapses. This underscores how foundational gradualism was to his evolutionary framework.
However, rapid radiation theory suggests the opposite–that most species emerged in short bursts, not through gradual steady accumulation. If true, this directly undermines uniformitarian assumptions and raises further key questions about the plausibility of theorized evolutionary mechanisms to explain these observations. For instance:
Q: Why do most species belong to a few clades, and why are such rapid speciation events said to be ‘rare’ yet dominant?
Intelligent Design theory presents a predictive contrast, as rapid radiation aligns more naturally with the idea of front-loaded potential or purposeful diversification.
Intelligent Design theory presents a predictive contrast, as rapid radiation aligns more naturally with the idea of front-loaded potential or purposeful diversification.
*If life was designed with an embedded capacity to adapt and flourish in new environments, then bursts of speciation would reflect activation of latent, in-built design, not random chance.
Another example is found in the commentary of the same article on ScienceDaily, where the researchers stated:
“’Rapid radiations’ of species are thought to occur when a new ecological niche opens up: for example, when a flock of grassquit birds dispersed from Central America to the virgin territory of the Galápagos Islands approximately 2.5 million years ago to diversify into the famous Darwin’s finches; or when an evolutionary innovation like powered flight prompted the radiation of bats 50 million years ago.”
Let’s deconstruct this reasoning: While on the one hand, the authors find that short bursts of speciation fully account for the vast majority of known species, on the other hand, they appeal to evolutionary processes and timelines as somehow (miraculously) explaining the origins of massive engineering wonders such as flight in bats!
Q: Who Is the Innovator?
Inserting the word ‘innovation’ is quite telling, as it implicitly admits an attribution of evolution as an ‘innovator’!
Retention of Evolutionary Assumptions…
While Invoking Miraculous Thinking!
Although the authors acknowledge rapid speciation, they retain an evolutionary framework in their core assumptions throughout the paper. For example, the article repeatedly invokes the alleged antiquity of species—hundreds of millions of years old—in at least three separate instances.Another example is found in the commentary of the same article on ScienceDaily, where the researchers stated:
“’Rapid radiations’ of species are thought to occur when a new ecological niche opens up: for example, when a flock of grassquit birds dispersed from Central America to the virgin territory of the Galápagos Islands approximately 2.5 million years ago to diversify into the famous Darwin’s finches; or when an evolutionary innovation like powered flight prompted the radiation of bats 50 million years ago.”
Let’s deconstruct this reasoning: While on the one hand, the authors find that short bursts of speciation fully account for the vast majority of known species, on the other hand, they appeal to evolutionary processes and timelines as somehow (miraculously) explaining the origins of massive engineering wonders such as flight in bats!
Q: Who Is the Innovator?
Inserting the word ‘innovation’ is quite telling, as it implicitly admits an attribution of evolution as an ‘innovator’!
Humans require intelligent minds simply to copy these inventions into our own technologies, for the engineering of flight involves significant irreducible complexity—the interdependence of numerous systems, without which functionality would collapse. Humans require intelligent minds to merely copy these inventions into our own technologies, as the engineering of flight ability entails significant irreducible complexity – the interdependence of numerous systems, without which, functionality would fail.
Q: Is it not a conundrum then to attribute such innovative power to the blind force of evolution, which depends on the ‘selection’ of random mutations to somehow work together to invent powered flight? The appeal to Darwinism offers no real explanatory power for these observations.
Q: Is it not a conundrum then to attribute such innovative power to the blind force of evolution, which depends on the ‘selection’ of random mutations to somehow work together to invent powered flight? The appeal to Darwinism offers no real explanatory power for these observations.
Philosophical Implications
Wein and Moen’s study once again reinforces findings that challenge the validity of uniformitarian assumptions. The revelation that most of Earth’s species stem from a handful of explosions invites us to reconsider the oft propagated story about life’s gradual unfolding. If biodiversity arises not through slow, steady change but through explosive bursts triggered by pivotal traits or ecological upheavals, then evolutionary theory must confront its own inherent contradictions. Q: Would this mounting evidence against gradualism—the very test Darwin sought to falsify his theory—cause it to ‘absolutely break down,’ in his own words?"
CEH/Dr. Sarah Buckland-Reynolds
Saturday, November 1, 2025
The Melchizedek Priesthood SERIES: PRIESTS DIE, CHRIST LIVES
Hebrews 7:23,24 And they truly were many priests, because they
were not suffered to continue by reason of death:
were not suffered to continue by reason of death:
But this Man, because He continues ever, has an unchangeable priesthood.
IN the NEWS - "Mysterious Maneuver"
This is NOT about freaking anyone out about this comet....but rather that in the future, things can make a "mysterious maneuver" shift the flight path (as in the story below) of future comets and /or asteroids that could unexpectedly hit the earth triggering panic as in....Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. Luke 21:26
"The interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS has puzzled scientists with an unexpected maneuver as it passed close to the sun. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) observed the comet exhibiting 'non-gravitational acceleration,' suggesting it was pushed by an unknown force rather than gravity.
3I/ATLAS displayed two main parts in its mysterious maneuver, one pushing it away from the sun and another nudging it slightly to the side. The comet also showed a significant increase in brightness and turned a surprising blue color, contrary to the typical red hue of comets.
3I/ATLAS is expected to make its closest approach to Earth on December 19, 2025, and scientists are eager to study its behavior as it moves away from the sun." msn
"The interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS has puzzled scientists with an unexpected maneuver as it passed close to the sun. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) observed the comet exhibiting 'non-gravitational acceleration,' suggesting it was pushed by an unknown force rather than gravity.
3I/ATLAS displayed two main parts in its mysterious maneuver, one pushing it away from the sun and another nudging it slightly to the side. The comet also showed a significant increase in brightness and turned a surprising blue color, contrary to the typical red hue of comets.
3I/ATLAS is expected to make its closest approach to Earth on December 19, 2025, and scientists are eager to study its behavior as it moves away from the sun." msn
Creation Moment 11/2/2025 - Time “Crystals” Found at the Quantum Level
"From the orderly orbit of the planets to the finely tuned rhythm of our own internal circadian cycles, centuries of discoveries have confirmed that the universe operates within a framework of orderly and time-bound precision.
--While these systems have long been a source of wonder, new discoveries suggest that timely order is not confined to macro-scale interactions; rather, even nano-scale subatomic particles exhibit intrinsic, orderly and rhythmic oscillations, suggesting that temporal structure is an embedded feature within matter itself.
In a momentous breakthrough published in Physical Review Letters (September 2025), researchers Ruso and Pohl at TU Wien University uncovered that orderly patterns of particle movement exist at the quantum level. These “time crystals” oscillate without being acted upon by any known external driver, but “self-organize” in rhythmic behavior, based on physical correlations between the particles themselves.
The discovery of these “time crystals” defies previous assumptions that quantum behavior is chaotic with random noise. These observations therefore open significant questions on interpretations of order, origins, and design.
While the second law of thermodynamics introduced the concept of the “arrow of time” (systems naturally evolving from order to disorder), evolutionary models propose that order arises temporarily and locally, being directed from energy gradients and environmental conditions that allow systems to self-organize. In an evolutionary framework therefore, rhythm is not embedded in matter itself but emerges from repeating interactions shaped by environmental conditions.
Despite this prevailing view, the discovery of time crystals contrasts with the evolutionary perspective. In quantum time crystals, rhythmic order arises internally without external drivers, challenging the assumption that time-based structure must be externally imposed.
For instance, in attempting to explain their findings, the authors stated that:
While the authors describe the link between the “physics ofdissipative quantum systems” and the behaviors of time crystals, there remains a vagueness about the root cause of such “emergence”. While the authors use the term “emergence” to describe how complex order arises, the use of this term often bypasses the discussion of processes that would sufficiently explain the origin of this process.
* As time crystals challenge the assumption that quantum systems begin in static or equilibrium states, it may suggest that rhythmic, correlated motion could be embedded from the outset, even in the early universe. However, a cosmological evolutionary framework provides inadequate explanatory power as to why particles should be predisposed to organize themselves.
Notwithstanding, this research shows that quantum systems defy randomness and produce coherence – a coherence that is not imposed from outside but arises from within the system.
Another major marker of design that has been revealed through this study is that the behavior of these time crystals is extremely nuanced – not being accounted for by merely averaging the field effects. In the words of the authors:
“We identify a second type of qCTC that is not predicted by mean-field theory but instead is driven by correlations.” …Remarkably, one of them emerges only in the presence of correlations, upon accounting for beyond-mean-field effects… The found qCTC phases do not rely on symmetries of the underlying master equation and are robust to perturbations, both of which are essential aspects for potential experiments.”
As its name implies, “mean-field theory” approximates each system’s component via the average influence of its constituents—thereby erasing the subtle interactions that drive complex behavior. Standard cosmological perturbation theory treats fluctuations linearly, akin to mean-field approximations that neglect correlations. However, as the authors note, “two distinct time-crystal phases … cannot be described within mean-field theory”. This failure signals greater complexity than standard quantum physics models account for: as something essential is lost when one merely relies on the single mean-field figure.
The simulations in this paper reveal that one of these two phases “emerges only in the presence of correlations, upon accounting for beyond-mean-field effects”. This implies that particle behavior is not randomly homogenous, estimable by isolated averages but is linked in a finely tuned network. Ignoring any connection would produce inaccurate estimations for the oscillations as each link plays a critical role. The emergence of a qCTC phase driven by correlations underscores that higher-order interactions can qualitatively change outcomes. The further finding that these phases are “robust to perturbations” may suggest an in-built resilience.
These discoveries in time crystals are yet one more example of modern science pointing us away from the concept of randomness and disorder, and toward the notion of design.
Rather than undermining faith, discoveries like time crystals deepen the case for intelligent design, as they reveal a universe where order is intrinsic. As Job was reminded, “Do you know the laws of the heavens? Can you set up God’s dominion over the earth?” (Job 38:33)."
--While these systems have long been a source of wonder, new discoveries suggest that timely order is not confined to macro-scale interactions; rather, even nano-scale subatomic particles exhibit intrinsic, orderly and rhythmic oscillations, suggesting that temporal structure is an embedded feature within matter itself.
In a momentous breakthrough published in Physical Review Letters (September 2025), researchers Ruso and Pohl at TU Wien University uncovered that orderly patterns of particle movement exist at the quantum level. These “time crystals” oscillate without being acted upon by any known external driver, but “self-organize” in rhythmic behavior, based on physical correlations between the particles themselves.
The discovery of these “time crystals” defies previous assumptions that quantum behavior is chaotic with random noise. These observations therefore open significant questions on interpretations of order, origins, and design.
The Evolutionary View of Time and Rhythm
In evolutionary frameworks (whether cosmological, physical, or biological) time and rhythm are viewed as emergent properties, not fundamental features of the universe. Time is treated as only one dimension of a matter and space continuum that began with the Big Bang, unfolding as the universe expanded.While the second law of thermodynamics introduced the concept of the “arrow of time” (systems naturally evolving from order to disorder), evolutionary models propose that order arises temporarily and locally, being directed from energy gradients and environmental conditions that allow systems to self-organize. In an evolutionary framework therefore, rhythm is not embedded in matter itself but emerges from repeating interactions shaped by environmental conditions.
Despite this prevailing view, the discovery of time crystals contrasts with the evolutionary perspective. In quantum time crystals, rhythmic order arises internally without external drivers, challenging the assumption that time-based structure must be externally imposed.
Design in the Deepest Realms: A Contrast with Evolutionary Theory
While describing the phenomenon of time crystals, the authors unintentionally expose various philosophical and scientific implications relevant to questions of origins and design.For instance, in attempting to explain their findings, the authors stated that:
“…the emergence of a continuous time-crystal (CTC) phase in this setting is directly connected to the physics of dissipative quantum systems…”
While the authors describe the link between the “physics ofdissipative quantum systems” and the behaviors of time crystals, there remains a vagueness about the root cause of such “emergence”. While the authors use the term “emergence” to describe how complex order arises, the use of this term often bypasses the discussion of processes that would sufficiently explain the origin of this process.
* As time crystals challenge the assumption that quantum systems begin in static or equilibrium states, it may suggest that rhythmic, correlated motion could be embedded from the outset, even in the early universe. However, a cosmological evolutionary framework provides inadequate explanatory power as to why particles should be predisposed to organize themselves.
Notwithstanding, this research shows that quantum systems defy randomness and produce coherence – a coherence that is not imposed from outside but arises from within the system.
Another major marker of design that has been revealed through this study is that the behavior of these time crystals is extremely nuanced – not being accounted for by merely averaging the field effects. In the words of the authors:
“We identify a second type of qCTC that is not predicted by mean-field theory but instead is driven by correlations.” …Remarkably, one of them emerges only in the presence of correlations, upon accounting for beyond-mean-field effects… The found qCTC phases do not rely on symmetries of the underlying master equation and are robust to perturbations, both of which are essential aspects for potential experiments.”
As its name implies, “mean-field theory” approximates each system’s component via the average influence of its constituents—thereby erasing the subtle interactions that drive complex behavior. Standard cosmological perturbation theory treats fluctuations linearly, akin to mean-field approximations that neglect correlations. However, as the authors note, “two distinct time-crystal phases … cannot be described within mean-field theory”. This failure signals greater complexity than standard quantum physics models account for: as something essential is lost when one merely relies on the single mean-field figure.
The simulations in this paper reveal that one of these two phases “emerges only in the presence of correlations, upon accounting for beyond-mean-field effects”. This implies that particle behavior is not randomly homogenous, estimable by isolated averages but is linked in a finely tuned network. Ignoring any connection would produce inaccurate estimations for the oscillations as each link plays a critical role. The emergence of a qCTC phase driven by correlations underscores that higher-order interactions can qualitatively change outcomes. The further finding that these phases are “robust to perturbations” may suggest an in-built resilience.
These discoveries in time crystals are yet one more example of modern science pointing us away from the concept of randomness and disorder, and toward the notion of design.
--Interestingly, these discoveries at the fine quantum scale, uncovers depth to the Scripture that declares “To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecclesiastes 3:1). Scripture has remained resonant with scientific observations, affirming that time is not random, rather, it is purposeful and governed by divine wisdom.
Rather than undermining faith, discoveries like time crystals deepen the case for intelligent design, as they reveal a universe where order is intrinsic. As Job was reminded, “Do you know the laws of the heavens? Can you set up God’s dominion over the earth?” (Job 38:33)."
CEH/Dr. Sarah Buckland-Reynolds
The Melchizedek Priesthood SERIES: Intro
For this Melchisedec, king of Salem,
priest of the most high God,
who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings,
and blessed him;
To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all;
first being by interpretation King of righteousness,
and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace; Without father, without mother,
without descent,
having neither beginning of days,
nor end of life;
but made like unto the Son of God;
abideth a priest continually.
Hebrews 7:1-3
"The name is composed from the two elements: melek(h), 'king', and á¹£edeq, which means either 'righteousness' or the proper name Zedek. With the addition of the hiriq compaginis ( indicating the archaic construct form, malk-Ä« means 'king of', so that the name literally translates to 'king of righteousness'. wiki
"THE priesthood of the worldly Sanctuary of the first covenant belonged to the sons of Levi; but that of the heavenly, of the better covenant, to the Son of God.
"The name is composed from the two elements: melek(h), 'king', and á¹£edeq, which means either 'righteousness' or the proper name Zedek. With the addition of the hiriq compaginis ( indicating the archaic construct form, malk-Ä« means 'king of', so that the name literally translates to 'king of righteousness'. wiki
"THE priesthood of the worldly Sanctuary of the first covenant belonged to the sons of Levi; but that of the heavenly, of the better covenant, to the Son of God.
He fulfills both the Priesthood of Melchizedek and Aaron. In some respects the Priesthood of Christ resembles that of Melchizedek; and in others that of Aaron or Levi.
1. He was “made a High Priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek.” Order: taxis, signifies “series, succession.” Christ, like Melchizedek, had no priestly descent of pedigree. He never followed nor will have a successor in office.
1. He was “made a High Priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek.” Order: taxis, signifies “series, succession.” Christ, like Melchizedek, had no priestly descent of pedigree. He never followed nor will have a successor in office.
And because He continues ever, has an unchangeable Priesthood, “which passes not from one to another.”
The Priesthood of Levi to be continuous had many and a succession of priests, “because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death.”
2. Being after the order of Melchizedek, He is superior to the sons of Levi; because He blessed and received tithes from them in Abraham.
3. He is King and Priest; a King by birth, being from the tribe of Judah, and a Priest by the oath of His Father.
4. Being Himself perfect, and His priesthood unending, He is able to “perfect forever” and “save them to the uttermost that come unto God by Him, seeing He ever lives to make intercession for them.”
The Levitical Priesthood He was not called after the order of Aaron; i.e. not in his succession; but this does not at all prove that the Priesthood of Aaron was not typical of the Priesthood of Christ.
Paul distinctly shows that it is. After calling upon us to...
Hebrews 3:1...consider the Apostle and High Priest of our profession [or religion], Christ Jesus,–He lays the foundation of the investigation by drawing the analogy between Moses over his house [oikos, “people”] and Christ over His.
Hebrews 5:4...as was Aaron. Like Aaron and his sons, He took upon Him flesh and blood, the seed of Abraham, Hebrews 4:15 ...was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin, Hebrews 2:10 ...[was made] perfect through suffering."
Hebrews 5:4...as was Aaron. Like Aaron and his sons, He took upon Him flesh and blood, the seed of Abraham, Hebrews 4:15 ...was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin, Hebrews 2:10 ...[was made] perfect through suffering."
Crozier
The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent,
The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent,
Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.
Psalm 110:4
Evidence for a Young Earth SERIES PAGE
The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. Genesis 1:2
Very Little Sediment on the SeafloorBent Rock LayersSoft Tissue in FossilsFaint Sun ParadoxRapidly Decaying Magnetic Field Carbon-14 in Fossils, Coal, and DiamondsShort-Lived CometsHelium in Radioactive RocksVery Little Salt in the SeaDNA in “Ancient” Bacteria
Creation Moment 11/1/2025 - This Witness of Creation
"Atheists say there is no evidence for the existence of God.
When presented with intelligent design arguments, atheists will often point to disease, mutations, and natural disasters that destroy life and the environment. They say something like, “What kind of God would make a world like this?”
The Biblical text most relevant to these questions is Romans 1:18–20. There the Apostle Paul writes,
Paul tells us that some things can be known about the unseen God from the things He has made. He is eternal. He is powerful. His divine nature is personal, not impersonal.
In Romans 2:14–16, Paul adds that God is a moral being, who has written His moral law in the conscience of every person. Even if a person has never seen or heard the written words of God given through the Old and New Testament authors, that person knows certain behaviors are right and others are wrong.
Paul also says this witness of creation to God’s existence and his nature has been seen by people “ever since the creation of the world” (Romans 1:20). It has been seen by all people at all times and in all places.
Approximately another 1,000 years before David (about 2000 BC), Job (Job 12:7–12) in poetic language, he commands us to study nature.
When presented with intelligent design arguments, atheists will often point to disease, mutations, and natural disasters that destroy life and the environment. They say something like, “What kind of God would make a world like this?”
The Biblical text most relevant to these questions is Romans 1:18–20. There the Apostle Paul writes,
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth.
For what can be known about God is plain to them,
because God has shown it to them.
For His invisible attributes,
namely, His eternal power and divine nature,
have been clearly perceived,
ever since the creation of the world,
in the things that have been made.
So they are without excuse.
Paul tells us that some things can be known about the unseen God from the things He has made. He is eternal. He is powerful. His divine nature is personal, not impersonal.
In Romans 2:14–16, Paul adds that God is a moral being, who has written His moral law in the conscience of every person. Even if a person has never seen or heard the written words of God given through the Old and New Testament authors, that person knows certain behaviors are right and others are wrong.
Paul also says this witness of creation to God’s existence and his nature has been seen by people “ever since the creation of the world” (Romans 1:20). It has been seen by all people at all times and in all places.
Approximately another 1,000 years before David (about 2000 BC), Job (Job 12:7–12) in poetic language, he commands us to study nature.
All these creatures nonverbally communicate that God is the source of their life and our’s and is the wise sovereign who guides and governs all these things.
As we study plants and animals and people, many of God’s attributes are revealed by the mind-boggling complexity of the DNA molecule, the amazing design and function of living creatures, the beautiful ecosystems, and the wonder of men and women made in the image of the Creator."
AIG
Monthly Viewer Update {October 2025}
Monthly Viewer Update {October 2025} {51,119}
Where YOU Are Viewing From
TOP 10 Nations
#1 U.S.A. (68.9%)#2 China (18.0%)#3 Singapore (5.1%)#4 Brazil (1.5%)#5 Mexico (1.4%)#6 India (1.4%)#7 Vietnam (1.2%)#8 Germany (1.0%)#9 Argentina (0.8%)#10 South Korea (0.7%)
Others of the 185 Remaining Nations (9.9%)
Deuteronomy 33:27
Leading among Others were Israel, Bangladesh,
Philippines, Turkey, Russia
Top 5 Viewed Posts of the Month
Thursday, October 30, 2025
Puritan Corner - Ultimate Doctrine
"No doctrine is more excellent, or necessary to be preached and studied, than Jesus Christ, and Him crucified."
by John Flavel (1627-1691)
For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified. 1 Corinthians 2:2
by John Flavel (1627-1691)
For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified. 1 Corinthians 2:2
Luther on "Enemies of the Cross of Christ"
Brethren, join in imitating me, and mark those who so live as you have an example in us. For many, of whom I have often told you and now tell you even with tears, live as enemies of the cross of Christ.
--Their end is destruction,
--their god is the belly,
--and they glory in their shame,
--with minds set on earthly things.
But our commonwealth is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will change our lowly body to be like His glorious body, by the power which enables Him even to subject all things to Himself. Philippians 3:17-21
"Of the sensual papistical dolts at Rome, cardinals, bishops, priests and the like, it is not necessary to speak here. Their works are manifest.
"Of the sensual papistical dolts at Rome, cardinals, bishops, priests and the like, it is not necessary to speak here. Their works are manifest.
All honorable secular authorities must confess they are simply abandoned knaves, living shameless lives of open scandal, avarice, arrogance, unchastity, vanity, robbery and wickedness of every kind. Not only are they guilty of such living, but shamelessly endeavor to defend their conduct. They must, then, be regarded enemies of Christ and of all honesty and virtue.
Hence every respectable man is justly antagonistic toward them.
But, as before said, Paul is not here referring to this class, but to eminent, godly individuals, whose lives are beyond reproach. These very ones, when Christians are encountered, are hostile and heinous enough to be able to forget all their own faults in the sight of God, and to magnify to huge beams the motes we Christians have. In fact, they must style the Gospel heresy and satanic doctrine for the purpose of exalting their own holiness and zeal for God.
The apostle makes his accusation yet more galling with the words “whose god is their belly.” Thus you hear how human righteousness, even at its best, extends no higher than to service of the sensual appetites."
The apostle makes his accusation yet more galling with the words “whose god is their belly.” Thus you hear how human righteousness, even at its best, extends no higher than to service of the sensual appetites."
Martin Luther
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)












.webp)

.webp)







.png)




