Thus the fourth commandment seems to be a source of perplexity to many people.
--It is so, however, only to those who wish to avoid its obligations.
--Such, we are happy to say, will always find it a thorn in their side and a prick in their eyes.
*To all others, it is a “delight, the holy of the Lord, honorable.” (Isaiah 58:13)
--There is, therefore, no necessity of going outside of the limits prescribed by the apostle’s language, and invading the realm of the moral law, and bringing in the weekly Sabbath of the Lord, which is just as distinct from these other sabbaths in its origin, nature, office, and destiny, as can possibly be.
**Moreover, Paul is careful to guard still further against any misunderstanding in this matter, by immediately adding (verse 17) this restrictive clause: “Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.”
--Thus he points out in just as plain language as could be used, just what sabbaths he refers to; it is only to those which belong to the system of types and shadows, and which are a part and parcel of that system.
*But this was never true of the weekly Sabbath, which originated, as the record in Genesis shows, before any type or shadow had, or could have had, a place in the economy of God’s grace in behalf of men." Uriah Smith




.webp)

.webp)






.webp)
.webp)









