And the Spirit & the bride say, come.... Reveaaltion 22:17

And the Spirit & the bride say, come.... Reveaaltion 22:17
And the Spirit & the bride say, come...Revelation 22:17 - May We One Day Bow Down In The DUST At HIS FEET ...... {click on blog TITLE at top to refresh page}---QUESTION: ...when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth? LUKE 18:8

Sunday, April 15, 2018

Numbers 21:5-9 Commentaries

From Commentaries of
Adam Clarke
Matthew Henry
Charles Spurgeon

And the people spake against God, and against Moses,
Wherefore have ye brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness?
for there is no bread, neither is there any water;
and our soul loatheth this light bread.
Numbers 21:5
Clarke - This light bread - הקלקל hakkelokel, a word of excessive scorn; as if they had said, This innutritive, unsubstantial, cheat - stomach stuff.
Henry - They have bread enough and to spare and yet they complain there is no bread, because, though they eat angels' food, yet they are weary of it manna itself is loathed, and called light bread, fit for children, not for men and soldiers. What will those be pleased with whom manna will not please?
Spurgeon - ....but they wanted something more substantial, something that had a coarser flavor about it, more of earth and less of heaven. There is no satisfying an unregenerate heart.
*
And the LORD sent fiery serpents among the people,
 and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died.
Numbers 21:6
Clarke - The animals mentioned here by Moses may have been called fiery because of the heat, violent inflammation, and thirst, occasioned by their bite;
Henry -  They in their pride had lifted themselves up against God and Moses, and now God humbled and mortified them, by making these despicable animals a plague to them. That artillery is now turned against them which had formerly been made use of in their defence against the Egyptians. He that brought quails to feast them let them know that he could bring serpents to bite them the whole creation is at war with those that are in arms against God.
*
 Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We have sinned,
for we have spoken against the LORD, and against thee;
 pray unto the LORD, that he take away the serpents from us.
And Moses prayed for the people.
Numbers 21:7
Spurgeon - Like a true mediator, he was always ready — even when they had most insulted him, and grieved his meek and quiet spirit, — still to bow the knee, and intercede with the Lord on their behalf.
*
And the LORD said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole:
and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten,
when he looketh upon it, shall live.
 And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole,
and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man,
when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.
Numbers 21:8,9
Clarke - And Moses made a serpent of brass - נחשת נחש nechash nechosheth . Hence we find that the word for brass or copper comes from the same root with nachash, which here signifies a serpent, probably on account of the color; ...
*That as neither the serpent, nor looking at it, but the invisible power of God healed the people,
*so neither the cross of Christ, nor his merely being crucified, but the pardon he has bought by his blood, communicated by the powerful energy of his Spirit, saves the souls of men.
Henry - *The devil is the old serpent, a fiery serpent, hence he appears as a great red dragon.
*Sin is the biting of this fiery serpent it is painful to the startled conscience, and poisonous to the seared conscience. 
*Satan's temptations are called his fiery darts. Lust and passion inflame the soul, so do the terrors of the Almighty, when they set themselves in array.
--At the last, sin bites like a serpent and stings like an adder and even its sweets are turned into the gall of asps.
It was God himself that devised and prescribed this antidote against the fiery serpents so our salvation by Christ was the contrivance of Infinite Wisdom God himself has found the ransom.
--It was a very unlikely method of cure so our salvation by the death of Christ is to the Jews a stumbling-block and to the Greeks foolishness.
--It was Moses that lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so the law is a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ, and Moses wrote of him.
Spurgeon - The fervent prayer of a righteous man may not prevail in the particular direction in which it is offered, but it “availeth much” in some direction or other.
Just as when the mists ascend they may not fall upon the very spot from which they rose, but they fall somewhere, and true prayer is never lost, it cometh back in blessing, if not according to our mind, yet according to another mind that is kinder and wiser than our own.

Brazen Serpent Chiasm

And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole,
and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man,
when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.
Numbers 21:8
 

Num 21:4-9
  A(21:4-5)  Complains of the people
    B(21:6)    
""the LORD sent among the people saraph serpents" (21:6)"   
(השׂרפים)
  A'(21:7)  Repentance of the people
    B'(21:8-9)    
""Make a saraph and mount it on a pole" (21:8)"   
(שׂרף)
A: Acts of the people.
B: Serpents.

Lift Up The Suffering Symbol performed by MICHAEL CARD

Lift Up The Suffering Symbol performed by MICHAEL CARD
https://www.youtube.com/embed/24JiAr2BMBA?list=PLT70zxsi10M8he78ssuNmHkQWiAUB4wTk
Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We have sinned, for we have spoken against the Lord, and against thee; pray unto the Lord that he take away the serpents from us. And Moses prayed for the people. And the Lord said unto Moses, Make a fiery serpent, and set it on a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live. And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole; and it came to pass that, if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.
Numbers 21:7-9

Hezekiah Destroys Nehushtan

"When the people of Israel were being bitten by a plague of snakes, God told Moses to make a bronze
snake as an antidote:
The LORD said to Moses, Make a snake and put it up on a pole; anyone who is bitten can look at it and live.  So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake, he lived. (Numbers 21:8-9 NIV)
The snake became known as “Nehushtan” (2 Kings 18:4) which is a play on the Hebrew words נחש (nachash = “snake”) and נחשת (nachoshet = “bronze”).
The bronze snake later became an object of worship and, eventually, Hezekiah had it destroyed:
Hezekiah… broke into pieces the bronze snake Moses had made, for up to that time the Israelites had been burning incense to it. (It was called Nehushtan.) (2 Kings 18:4 NIV)
Jesus referred to the bronze snake as an allegory of himself.
Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life. (John 3:14-15 NIV)
Just as the snakes killed the Israelites, so sin kills us. And just as looking to a bronze snake healed the Israelites, so looking to Jesus heals us from the curse of sin."
RobHyndman

Michelangelo’s Fresco

 "..we read from Numbers 21:4-9. Michelangelo’s fresco the Brazen Serpent, from the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, opens up this scene from the Exodus."
HovakNajarian
Therefore the people came to Moses, and said,
We have sinned, for we have spoken against the LORD,
and against thee; pray unto the LORD,
that he take away the serpents from us.
Numbers 21:7

Serpents vs. the Sheep

Therefore the people came to Moses, and said,
We have sinned, for we have spoken against the Lord,
and against thee; pray unto the Lord that he take away the serpents from us.
Numbers 21:7
 
"For this nation of shepherds, the serpent lifted on a pole served as a strong symbol which they all well understood. Snakes are a deadly menace to sheep. A dog might get bit by a rattlesnake and survive without any special treatment, but sheep are much more fragile. This is one of the reasons why shepherds must carry a rod."
Doug Batchelor

Serpent in the Wilderness

And the Lord said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole:
 and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live.
Numbers 21:8

"This might seem an incredible story, but it was confirmed by none other than the Lord Jesus Himself: "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but
have eternal life" (John 3:14-15).

A plague of poisonous snakes had infested the camp of Israel, sent as a divine judgment because of their complaints and ingratitude, and many people had died. When they confessed their sin and Moses prayed for their deliverance, God in His grace prescribed this unique remedy.

*There is, of course, no naturalistic process which can heal a deadly snakebite merely by a look.
*Neither, of course, is there a naturalistic explanation for the salvation of a sin poisoned soul merely by looking with faith upon the crucified Son of man.
--Both are mighty miracles, with the first being beautifully designed by God to be a prophetic foreshadowing of the other.

The symbolism is striking. The brass serpent impaled on the pole represented the poisonous serpents slain, but it also spoke of "that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan," eventually cast forever into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:2,10).

All of this, however, was only the symbol. The real deliverance required Christ to be made "sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him" (2 Corinthians 5:21). The Son of man must be lifted up on the cross, and then all who see Him, and believe, receive life instead of death." HMM

Creation Moment 4/16/2018 - MelLec

"Fungal infections can be a pain to eradicate. But new results show why these infections can take an even tighter hold on people or animals that are missing a specific protein. The international research team that discovered this protein, and its importance, named it MelLec. This protein helps fight
fungal infections by identifying a specific type of melanin that fungi make. Several aspects of this new discovery fit a creation-based model of creature adaptation.

Tiny pancake-shaped cells make up blood-vessel walls and produce MelLec. Many copies of MelLec lurk throughout blood vessels and possibly elsewhere, waiting for an invading fungus. As soon as MelLec senses the fungal melanin, it sends a signal inside the cell that summons roaming cells to come manage the invading fungus.

A common fungus named Aspergillis helps keep the earth clean. When an animal dies, this fungus, among others, begins to recycle the fresh carcass. Until it dies, the living animal must keep the fungus at bay. That’s where MelLec comes in. Without MelLec to detect fungi, they could more easily consume animals even while they’re still alive.

Fungal melanin lies outside the organism,
whereas the creature makes MelLec inside itself.

Guliuzza argues that internal mechanisms of adaptation, like biological sensors, comprise a little-explored realm of the life sciences that points to an ingenious Creator.
After all,
could raw melanin ever craft a protein designed to latch onto itself?
Does the fungus somehow specify how the host’s sensor should recruit immune cells to the area to manage the fungus?
Surely not. The creation option, although unpopular, at least posits a real Designer to explain high-tech design like miniaturized fungal melanin sensors.

Guliuzza recently wrote, “Obviously, sensors play a key role in a design-based, organism-focused framework of adaptability.” The discovery of melanin-sensing MelLec aligns with design." ICR

DESIRE OF AGES: Audio & Pull Quotes- Chapter 44

The True Sign

Audio:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/rjTQ_dRFiiA?list=PL4ByrircmXL6qt2QplU6IudoOYVgzBS3C

...........a deaf, stammering man was brought to Him. Jesus did not, according to His custom, restore the man by a word only. Taking him apart from the multitude, He put His fingers in his ears, and
touched his tongue; looking up to heaven, He sighed at thought of the ears that would not be open to the truth, the tongues that refused to acknowledge the Redeemer.
*The Sadducees courted the favor of the ruling power in order to maintain their own position and authority. *The Pharisees, on the other hand, fostered the popular hatred against the Romans, longing for the time when they could throw off the yoke of the conqueror.
---But Pharisee and Sadducee now united against Christ. Like seeks like; and evil, wherever it exists, leagues with evil for the destruction of the good.
Now the Pharisees and Sadducees came to Christ, asking for a sign from heaven.
And He sighed deeply in His spirit, and saith, Why doth this generation seek after a sign?
Mark 8:12

Chiasm of Jairus Daughter Raised To Life

And he put them all out, and took her by the hand,
and called, saying, Maid, arise.
Luke 8:54

Luke 8:49-56
  A(8:49)  8:49Your daughter is dead (8:49)   (τέθνηκεν)
    B(8:50)    Words of Jesus
      C(8:51-52a)      8:52 All were weeping and mourning for her (8:52)   (ἔκλαιον)
        D(8:52b)        8:52 she is not dead, but sleeping.(8:52)
      C'(8:53)      8:53 they ridiculed him (8:53)   (κατεγέλων)
    B'(8:54)    Words of Jesus
  A'(8:55-56)  8:55 Her breath returned and she immediately arose. (8:55)   (ἀνέστη)
A: Death and resurrection of the girl.
B: Words of Jesus.
C: Contrast of weeping and laughing.
D: She is not dead.

New Age version of "Atonement"

And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
Matthew 24:4–5
Biblical Atonement or New Age At-One-Ment?

"In 1965, Columbia University Professor of Medical Psychology, Helen Schucman, heard an “inner voice” saying, “This is a course in miracles. Please take notes.”
Schucman’s initial resistance was overcome when the “inner voice,” identifying itself as “Jesus,” told her the purpose of the course:
Part of the plan is taking down A Course in Miracles, and I am fulfilling my part in the agreement, as you will fulfill yours. ...Because of the acute emergency, however, the usual slow, evolutionary process is being by-passed in what might best be described as a “celestial speed-up.”

In the seven and a half years of cumulative dictation that became A Course in Miracles, Schucman’s
“Jesus” presents a whole new way of looking at the world. Using Christian terminology, sophisticated psychology, and convincing authority, Schucman’s “Jesus” teaches a completely different gospel than the one found in the Bible. His New Age/New Gospel wholly contradicts the Bible’s Gospel of Jesus Christ.

The Course also teaches that while “Christ” is in Jesus, so “Christ” is in everyone—and that the “Christ” in everyone is their divine connection with God and with each other. The Course further teaches that a “slain Christ has no meaning.”
It states that wrong thinking has produced the misperception that man is a “sinner” and that he needs an external Christ to save him from his “sins.” The Course teaches that salvation has nothing to do with Jesus’ death on the cross. Salvation comes from what the Course calls the “Atonement” (“at-one-ment”) process.

This “Atonement,” or “atoning,” is when each person remembers and affirms and experiences their
“oneness” (at-one-ment) with God and creation.
The “Atonement” is the Course’s key to undoing “fear” and dispelling the illusion that man is “separate” from God. The Course stresses that the healing of the world is dependent upon each person’s fulfilling their Atonement “function” to teach this “oneness” to the world. When everyone comes to understand that “all is love and all is God,” then “inner peace” and “world peace” will finally happen. Only “fear” and the illusion of “separation” stand in the way of man’s attaining this peace for himself and his world." LighthouseTrails

SUMMARY:
Biblical Atonement = Christ makes an atoning for your sins so you can be with Him for eternity
New Age Atonement = You become one with Christ who is in you-in everything achieving at-one-ment
-----This New Age version is CREEPING into Christendom...including among Franciscans...

17 Reasons SERIES: #16

17 Reasons why Christianity should NOT have succeeded....

"17 factors to be considered -- places where Christianity "did the wrong thing" in order to be a successful religion. It is my contention that the only way Christianity did succeed is because it was a truly revealed faith -- and because it had the irrefutable witness of the Resurrection." J.P.Holding

Factor #16 -- Miscellaneous Contrarium But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1 Corinthians 2:14 "In this section we will be placing miscellaneous notes about teachings and attitudes of Jesus and early Christianity which were contrary to what was accepted as normal in the first century.
From Malina and Rohrbaugh's Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels and the one on John as well:
  • Jesus taught people to break even with family, if needed, for the sake of the Kingdom; he also indicated a highly inclusive assembly in a highly inclusive society. Christianity itself,
    had beliefs which would have alienated others.
    Was it worth the price?
  • Relatedly, leaving the family usually meant forsaking material goods, in line with Jesus' demand to the rich young ruler.
  • In his teachings Jesus often made reversals of common expectations that would have grossly offended the majority. The "Good Samaritan" parable is an example -- we all know that Samaritans were despised people; that would have been offensive enough! But few realize that the victim was also drawn up as someone broadly hated: The victim (and the Samaritan as well) were traders, who often grew rich at the expense of others, and were despised by the masses who saw them as thieves and would actually have sympathized with the bandits who robbed them! Jesus completely reversed the stereotypes in a way that would have shocked most of his listeners. 
  • A similar reversal: the invitation to, and acceptance of, Zaccheus. By dining with Zach, Jesus indicated fellowship with one whose values he shared. The crowd was dismayed, because tax collectors were stereotyped as "rapacious extortioners." Zach's pronouncement, often understood to mean he is now paying back what he has stolen, actually means he has been paying back already anyone he discovers he has cheated (even before he met Jesus!) and Jesus' fellowship is therefore understood as saying, "I believe him" -- whereas the crowd does not.
  • We may not think much of Mary sitting at Jesus' feet while Martha does the housework; we may even sympathize, but the ancients would not have. Because a woman's reputation depended on her ability to run a household, Martha's complaint would be seen as legitimate -- and Mary herself, because she sat and listened rather than help, was "acting like a male"! This example would have been shocking to the ancients.
  • The theme of being "born again" was a real shocker! When one was born, one's honor status was considered fixed at birth. Only extraordinary circumstances allowed for a change in honor status. Being born again would mean changing one's honor status in a very fundamental way, "a life-changing event of staggering proportions." Preaching a "new birth" would have been inconceivable! " J.P.Holding

Creation Moment 4/15/2018 - Wright is WRONG

There is a heresy related to the opening chapters of Genesis that has been popular in theological liberal circles...N.T. Wright is a good example of a proponent of this nonsensical reasoning.
Here is how N.T. Wright is presented by the secular media...

"TIME Magazine called him “one of the most formidable figures in the world of Christian thought.” Newsweek once labeled him “the world’s leading New Testament scholar.” His name is N.T. Wright, and he has just written a controversial book on the Bible.
In “Surprised by Scripture: Engaging Contemporary Issues,” Wright comes out swinging on theological hot buttons such as Darwinian evolution, whether Adam was a historical figure, and why he thinks the Bible makes space for women pastors." RNS

Here is the question posed for Wright:
"RNS: You address the question of whether Adam was a historical figure in one of the first chapters of the book, and you’re also an authority on the Apostle Paul. Another Theologian I respect, Dr. Albert Mohler, has written, “If Adam was not a historical figure, and thus if there was no Fall into sin and all humanity did not thus sin in Adam, then Paul’s telling of the Gospel is wrong.” How do you respond?"

Here's Wright's Response:
"The way I see it is that
--There were many hominids or similar creatures,
--part of the long slow process of God’s good creation.
--And at a particular time God called a particular pair for a particular task:  to look after his creation and make it flourish in a whole new way.....
--The point is that if you start, not with Adam and a “moral test,”
--but with Adam and Eve and a vocation,
then a lot of things in Paul look significantly different."
RNS


For some insight into how warped his theological worldview has become--this quote from the interview demonstrates it:
"But it’s important that we do not reduce the Bible to a collection of true doctrines and right ethics."
RNS
Now you know how this heresy comes about in someone's brain....
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit,
 after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world,
and not after Christ.
Colossians 2:8

Saturday, April 14, 2018

DESIRE OF AGES: Audio & Pull Quotes- Chapter 43

Barriers Broken Down

Audio:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/cKjC8gO5MJc?list=PL4ByrircmXL6qt2QplU6IudoOYVgzBS3C

In faith the woman of Phoenicia flung herself against the barriers that had been piled up between Jew and Gentile.
Against discouragement, regardless of appearances that might have led her to doubt, she trusted the Savior's love. It is thus that Christ desires us to trust in Him. The blessings of salvation are for every soul. Nothing but his own choice can prevent any man from becoming a partaker of the promise in Christ by the gospel.
Without distinction of age, or rank, or nationality, or religious privilege, all are invited to come unto Him and live. Whosoever believeth on Him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference.
Acts 17:26

Forgotten Glimpse in Gethsemane

A Glimpse into Gethsemane that is forgotten by most or not well preached on or studied.....
A Doctor explains what sweating blood means medically....
And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly:
and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground.
Luke 22:44
 
"In Gethsemane, Christ fell dying to the ground according to Ellen White.  This was clearly due to the weight of the sins of the world and the “sweating of blood” was a physical sign that Ellen White’s assertion is also correct.  


(When red blood cells extrude through the blood vessels and skin to become “sweat”, death is certain and immediate.) 

An angel had to come to “strengthen” Christ—to reverse the process and keep him alive. Christ’s cry “it is finished” timed at the moment of the evening sacrifice on Passover day shows that the Father separated Himself completely from Christ at that specially designed moment to draw man’s attention to the sacrifice, and that it was that separation which “broke the heart of Christ”."
Ed Nelson M.D./F7

SDA Issues - WARNING

"When these spiritualistic deceptions are revealed to be what they really are--the secret workings of evil spirits--those who have acted a part in them will become as men who have lost their minds."
Letter 311, 1905, p. 5. (To Brethren Daniells and Prescott, and Their Associates, October 30, 1905 E.G.W.
That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
Ephesians 4:14

On The Streets Of Babylon: April 23 the big day on the streets?

Babylon is fallen, is fallen,...  Come out of her, my people,
Revelation 14:8/18:4
 
There seem to be some astir on the Streets of Babylon thinking the so-called rapture will occur on "April 23".....

"David Meade tells the U.K.'s Daily Express newspaper that on April 23, the sun and moon will be in Virgo, as will Jupiter, which represents the Messiah.

For a certain branch of evangelical Christianity, Revelation 12:1–2 describes the beginning of what is known as the Rapture and the second coming of Christ.
In the passage, the woman is represented as Virgo.
According to Meade, the alignment represents “the Lion of the tribe of Judah,” marking the Rapture, the belief that Christ will bring the faithful into paradise prior to a period of tribulation on earth that precedes the end of time.

Meade said he believes the so-called Planet X, which is also known as Nibiru, will appear above the sky on the April date, causing volcanic eruptions, tsunamis and earthquakes.
NASA repeatedly has said Planet X is a hoax.

However, author Jonathan Sarfati remains skeptical.
He told the Express: “As usual with any astrology (or Christian adaptations of it), one cherry-picks the stars that fit the desired conclusion.
“There is nothing to suggest that April 23 is a momentous date for biblical prophecy, and Christians need to be careful about being drawn into such sensationalist claims." FOX

17 Reasons SERIES: #15

17 Reasons why Christianity should NOT have succeeded....

"17 factors to be considered -- places where Christianity "did the wrong thing" in order to be a successful religion. It is my contention that the only way Christianity did succeed is because it was a truly revealed faith -- and because it had the irrefutable witness of the Resurrection." J.P.Holding

Factor #15 -- A Prophet Without Honor
A prophet is not without honor, but in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house. Mark 6:4

"We have already noted above that Jesus died a dishonorable form of death, and ...There is more to this matter of dishonor, but so as not to be appearing to stack the deck, let's look at some other places where Jesus endured disgrace -- and thereby also offended the sensibilities of his contemporaries:
  • The mocking before his execution -- this was no mere game of dress-up, but a calculated insult to Jesus' honor and his claim to be King of the Jews.
  • The charges themselves -- on the surface, Jesus openly committed blasphemy and pled guilty to sedition. "Those who elected to follow such a subversive and disgraced man were immediately suspect in the eyes of [Jews and Romans]." [DeSilva, 46]
  • The burial -- Byron McCane has written in an article The Shame of Jesus' Burial in which he argues that Joseph of Arimathea had clear motives, even aside from being a disciple of Jesus, to arrange for the burial: It fits the requirement of Deut. 21:22-23 to bury one hung on a tree before sunset, and as a Sanhedrin member Joseph would have this concern and want to make arrangements. On the other hand, that Jesus was buried in Joseph's tomb -- and not in a tomb belonging to his family -- was itself dishonorable. The lack of mourners for Jesus was also a great dishonor."
  • J.P.Holding



Creation Moment 4/14/2018 - Time Debate

But when the fulness of the time was come,... Galatians 4:4

"Clearly, causes cannot happen after their effects in time, even when the effect is time’s beginning. But could the cause of time’s beginning occur before time’s beginning in time? Of course not! Nothing can occur before time’s beginning in time; such an idea is self-contradictory. Thus, we have only one option left: the cause of time’s beginning occurred when time began. In other words, cause and effect (since the effect is time’s beginning) were simultaneous.


Note that I’m talking here of time’s beginning, not necessarily the universe’s beginning. We can conceive of the two being distinct without contradiction. For instance, say that God counted to three before He created the universe. In this scenario, the universe began after time began. If God counted in sequence before He created the universe, time would’ve existed before the universe began.

Moreover, the relevance of simultaneous causation isn’t affected by how long ago time began. Of course, the Bible teaches that it began around 6,000 years ago. But even if time began with the supposed 13.7 billion years ago, simultaneous causation remains the only way for time to begin as an effect.

But is simultaneous causation a coherent concept? Since effects cannot precede their causes in time, it could only be incoherent if effects must follow their causes in time. But why think this is true?
First, there’s no obvious incoherence in the term ‘simultaneous cause’.

Could it be that we only ever experience effects following causes in time? Even if that were true (which is debatable), it wouldn’t show that effects must always follow their causes in time. A prince of a tropical nation who only ever experiences liquid water can’t thereby argue that ice is impossible. Indeed, if time began and had a cause, it must be an exception to this.

And consider the theological consequences of saying an effect must follow its cause in time. If so, then time must be uncaused. This is true whether time began or not.
Without a moment preceding time’s beginning in which a cause could operate, time must be uncaused if time began. Similarly, without a beginning, time cannot have a cause preceding it.

Thus, time can’t be an effect if it has no beginning.
And if time can’t be an effect, then it must be uncaused.
But if time must be uncaused, not even God can be time’s cause.
Can this be avoided by positing time as a divine attribute? No, that’s a category mistake. Eternity is a divine attribute, which describes God’s relation to time. However, the Bible teaches that God is the sole source of all things, and it strongly implies that time began.

Nonetheless, we can give examples of simultaneous causation: e.g. a ball sitting on a cushion. This example goes back to Immanuel Kant.
In this example, the depression in the cushion (the effect) lasts as long as the ball is sitting on the cushion (the cause). This would be true even if the ball had been sitting on the cushion forever, or if God had created them ex nihilo so that they began to exist simultaneously. As such, at any given time cause and effect are both occurring; i.e. they are occurring simultaneously. Thus, far from being “a philosophical fudge factor”, simultaneous causation is both coherent and even something we regularly experience.

Of course, if time began, then the atheist’s only way out is to say that time began uncaused. But if time began uncaused, it would be an inexplicable brute fact. And why think time’s beginning is inexplicable? Nothing comes from nothing. If it did, then anything could come from nothing, not just time or universes.

Now, you ask: “If God is outside of time, he can create time and have a motive to do so without time passing, correct?"
First, if God is outside time, can He be in time? If He can’t, can He create time?
God is responsible for time’s beginning. But that means at least one effect occurred when its cause occurred. It could be no other way for time’s beginning. And there’s no logical problem with saying so. We thus can’t say that effects must follow their causes in time. As such, we can use causality and time’s beginning as arguments for God. God is the only plausible candidate for causing time to begin." CMI

Friday, April 13, 2018

DESIRE OF AGES: Audio & Pull Quotes- Chapter 42

 Tradition

Audio:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/JWV3siGhheY?list=PL4ByrircmXL6qt2QplU6IudoOYVgzBS3C

Whenever the message of truth comes home to souls with special power, Satan stirs up his agents to start a dispute over some minor question. Thus he seeks to attract attention from the real issue.
To the multitude, and afterward more fully to His disciples, Jesus explained that defilement comes not from without, but from within. Purity and impurity pertain to the soul.
Let all who accept human authority, the customs of the church, or the traditions of the fathers, take heed to the warning conveyed in the words of Christ, In vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. Matthew 15:9

Sing To The Father performed by the MARANATHA SINGERS

Sing To The Father performed by the MARANATHA SINGERS
https://www.youtube.com/embed/gEkIWy4K3Do?list=PLT70zxsi10M8VZm8FbYpDkjU0xbOLuNGK
 Sing unto him, sing psalms unto him...
1 Chronicles 16:9

17 Reasons SERIES: #14

17 Reasons why Christianity should NOT have succeeded....

"17 factors to be considered -- places where Christianity "did the wrong thing" in order to be a successful religion. It is my contention that the only way Christianity did succeed is because it was a truly revealed faith -- and because it had the irrefutable witness of the Resurrection." J.P.Holding

Factor #14 -- An Ignorant Deity?But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; 1 Corinthians 1:27


 "Scholars of all persuasions have long recognized the "criteria of embarrassment" as a marker for
authentic words of Jesus. Places where Jesus claims to be ignorant (not knowing the day or hour of his return; not knowing who touched him in the crowd) or shows weakness are taken as honest recollections and authentic (even where miracles stories often are not!). This is a lesser cousin of the crucifixion factor above -- if you want a decent deity, you have to make him fully respectable.  You have to have a trump card to overcome that seeming two of spades; otherwise critics like Celsus have more axes to grind."J.P.Holding

Greek i’do

Nevertheless I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed,
and am persuaded that he is able to keep that
which I have committed unto him against that day.
                              2 Timothy 1:12

"The apostle Paul uses a precision of synonyms. We are to “know” the One in whom we have believed and to be “persuaded” that He is able to “keep” us.

The knowledge Paul cited (Greek i’do) emphasizes mental understanding as opposed to experiential knowledge or intuitive perception. I’do coupled with the word for persuasion (Greek peitho) strengthens the assurance Paul is promising. Our confidence is not based on mere emotion but on a clear grasp of God’s secure salvation.
 
Our surety is based on who God is." HMM III

Panagaea vs. Rodinia

"Debate exists over the pre-Flood continental configuration, with some creation geologists
advocating for an initial created supercontinent called Rodinia.

However, we chose a slightly modified Pangaea because it has the most empirical geological evidence supporting it, including the best fit of the continents. We placed a narrow sea (300 km) between North America and Africa/Europe, allowing for limited plate subduction, an early Flood closure of the pre-Atlantic, and the formation of the Appalachian/Caledonian Mountains. The width of this pre-Atlantic is based on subducted plate remnants that diminish beneath the Appalachians below 300 km, supporting this narrow-sea interpretation.

Another reason we favored Pangaea over Rodinia is that our current ocean floor was evidently created when the original creation week seafloor was consumed by subduction during the Flood event. It was the density contrast of the heavy, cold, original ocean crust (the lithosphere) that allowed the runaway subduction process to begin and continue. The density difference served essentially as the “fuel.” Geophysicist John Baumgardner described it as “gravitational energy driving the motion” of the plates. The “runaway” process continued until the original oceanic lithosphere was consumed. There was no geophysical means or reason to stop the rapid plate motion until the density contrast was fully alleviated. At that moment, the newer, more buoyant lithosphere ceased subducting, bringing plate motion to a virtual standstill. As a consequence, today we only witness small, residual plate motions of centimeters per year.

A pre-Flood world that resembled Rodinia would require the consumption of nearly all the pre-Flood ocean crust twice. The first time would be while the continents from Rodinia moved into the configuration of Pangaea, and then a second time when Pangaea split into the present global configuration.

Geophysically, the first breakup of Rodinia and reconfiguration into Pangaea would be possible, but it would also consume all of the dense pre-Flood ocean crust. A second move would then be rendered impossible since any significant amount of new ocean crust created while splitting up Rodinia would not have enough density contrast to fuel a second episode of subduction. As mentioned above, it is the consumption of the cold, more dense pre-Flood ocean crust that caused runaway subduction in the first place. Therefore, if there had been a Rodinia, we would still be in a Pangaea continental configuration today." ICR
.....the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up,
and the windows of heaven were opened.
Genesis 7:11

Creation Moment 4/13/2018 - Denisovan DNA Shown to Be Human...Again

Therefore is the name of it called Babel;
because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth:
and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.
Genesis 11:9

"Denisovans are ancient humans represented by various teeth and a finger bone found in a Siberian cave. Their claim to fame is largely based on the DNA extracted from these few fragments of human remains. According to evolutionists, they are more closely related to Neanderthals than modern humans. But their DNA is essentially human, and people all over the world today carry many of the same gene variants found in Denisovans.


Homo erectus supposedly migrated out of Africa about one million years ago. About 500,000 years later, the ancient human ancestor of Neanderthals and Denisovans is claimed to have made the same migration. Then, according to this legend, anatomically modern humans migrated about 120,000 years ago and traveled to Europe and Asia, where they interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans already living there.

New research confirms the results of previous studies showing that Denisovan-based regions of the genome are common in Asian people groups and that they interbred with modern humans. Interestingly, the largest proportion of Denisovan DNA in the human genome was found in people from the remote islands of Papua New Guinea, a long way from the Denisovan cave in Siberia. Amazingly, these island people also had a healthy dose of Neanderthal DNA. No good evolutionary reason for this anomaly was offered.

According to the data, all humans belong to the same genetic group. This agrees perfectly with the biblical view and agrees with other studies which show that the current status of the human genome can be no more than 5,000 years. After the global Genesis Flood about 4,500 years ago, Noah’s three sons and their wives formed the basis for repopulating the planet. Their descendants led to the 70 people groups comprising the Table of Nations. As these peoples dispersed from the Mediterranean region across the world, they took their own variants of the human genome with them, establishing genetic lineages unique to their ancestral founding families along with variants of genes shared by other people groups. Thus, it’s not surprising that evolutionists cannot make any sense of this genetic data with their errant timeline and convoluted Out-of-Africa dispersal model." ICR

Thursday, April 12, 2018

DESIRE OF AGES: Audio & Pull Quotes- Chapter 41

The Crisis in Galilee

Audio:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/6kLjNs1afGQ?list=PL4ByrircmXL6qt2QplU6IudoOYVgzBS3C

When Christ forbade the people to declare Him king, He knew that a turning point in His history was reached. Multitudes who desired to exalt Him to the throne today would turn from Him tomorrow.
The price of heaven is Jesus.
As our physical life is sustained by food, so our spiritual life is sustained by the word of God.
The way to heaven is through faith in The Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. John 1:29