IN the NEWS - Secular News Admits VATICAN was/is INVOLDED

For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. 

Revelation 18:3
Q: What will be the next move for the kings, merchants and beast for global control?

"The powers-that-be were so confident in the success of their endeavor that they essentially proclaimed global government by

bureaucrats and corporations in the very midst of covid. Calling it the “Council for Inclusive Capitalism” working in collusion with the
Vatican.

The question we have to ask today is, where did it all go? 

For example, in 2020 almost no one knew what ESG was. By 2023 everyone understood that the meaningless acronym for “Environmental, Social, Governance” is actually an insidious cover designed to hide the woke capitalism agenda.

Woke capitalism, also known as inclusive capitalism, is a centralization program which links together governments, NGOs as well as international banks and corporations under one ideological umbrella (globalism, multiculturalism, DEI, climate change, etc).

This massive cartel uses monetary incentives and extortion to force businesses and individuals to conform to a woke/socialist model.

For the last decade these groups have been funding a suffocating propaganda campaign, forcing woke indoctrination onto the masses. However, the globalists didn’t comprehend the level of push-back that they ultimately encountered.

In their arrogance, they ended up inspiring more resistance, not less.

And so, terms like ESG and DEI are being abandoned. Even Lynn Forester de Rothschild, head of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, was forced to admit that ESG is dead and needs to be rebranded.

They used the term “New World Order”, then switched to “Multipolar World Order”, then to “the Great Reset” and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”. This makes it very difficult for researchers to track the most current mechanisms.

in the last year, “Stakeholder Capitalism” has become the fresh code for much of their renewed efforts. It’s not a new term, but it is being used more often by the elites to draw less attention. Some use the phrase “stakeholder capitalism 3.0” or “third phase stakeholder capitalism”.

The original idea being that corporations can no longer make profits a priority. Rather, they must produce equal outcomes (not just equal opportunities) in order to participate in the interdependent

international economy.

 

In order to get access to the system, companies must promote approved narratives on climate and social justice, as well as partner with governments and NGOs to make DEI equity a reality.
The companies that don’t participate will face pressure from government officials and will not be able to compete with companies that comply. The problem is, this requires that meritocracy be erased and that producers be forced to subsidize feeders on a planetary scale.

It’s a cartel, remember, and western political leaders are the enforcers. The U.S. is the only place where ESG is in retreat. This could change in the near term as Europeans grow increasingly rebellious against the multicultural coup, but it does illustrate the fact that woke capitalism (stakeholder capitalism) cannot survive without government intervention." 

ZeroHedge

Papal Notes - Turns out Leo is a Wokester

Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. 2 Timothy 4:2-4

"Pope Leo XIV welcomed media representatives from around the world to the Vatican, expressing gratitude for their coverage of recent events in Rome. In his address, he called on news organizations to stand in solidarity with the mission of the Church, urging them to move away from reporting on what he characterized as divisive or hateful—content he believes undermines efforts toward global unity and harmony.
The Holy See Press Office published the following remarks by Pope Leo XIV during his meeting with the media.
“Let me, therefore, reiterate today the Church’s solidarity with

journalists.”
“Today, one of the most important challenges is to promote communication that can bring us out of the ‘Tower of Babel’ in which we sometimes find ourselves, out of the confusion of loveless languages that are often ideological or partisan.”
“Disarmed and disarming communication allows us to share a different view of the world and to act in a manner consistent with our human dignity. You are at the forefront of reporting on conflicts and aspirations for peace.”
Pope Leo XIV is asserting his influence over the global media narratives, advocating for a unified message that aligns with his

vision of a spiritually and politically united world.
In the final conflict between truth and error, free speech will be indispensable for ensuring that the message of God’s Word will be proclaimed with boldness and without restriction. As the world moves toward greater unity, there will certainly be efforts not only to consolidate political and religious power but also to enforce a single ideological narrative. As spiritual darkness deepens and opposition to biblical truth intensifies, the ability to speak freely will become a vital tool for those called to share the gospel and expose error.

Censorship, whether by governments, religious authorities, or media institutions, poses a direct threat to the proclamation of the everlasting gospel of Revelation 14:6-12. In such a time, the unfiltered presentation of this gospel must not be silenced, for it is through the open public dissemination of God’s truth that light will pierce the darkness, calling souls to repentance and preparing them for Christ’s return." 

AdventMessenger

IN the NEWS - Not "Conspiracy Theory" Anymore

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 

Revelation 13:17

"Q: Remember when we were told the “digital Euro” was just a conspiracy theory?
Well, it turns out that not only is it real, but it’s been in the works for five years. And Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, just admitted it.

Now it’s ready for launch.

In a recent speech, Legarde casually admitted that the ECB “started

working on the digital Euro way back actually when [she] started [her] term five and a half years ago,” even though last year “she told the European Parliament that CBDC skepticism stems from conspiracy theories.”
If they launch this in 18 to 48 months our whole world is going to be different.

The stakes for privacy, free markets, and individual liberty couldn’t be higher.

The problem with digital currency is that “it can be turned off” by the government, which means it’s a weapon in their back pocket to wield against dissenters.

CBDCs are the kinds of tool that appear very much like the tools foretold that will be employed by the Antichrist.
The United States is in the early stages of developing a digital currency." 

GlennBeck

Friends of Your Enemy: They Really Do Want You Dead

The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 

1 Corinthians 15:26

"There is a clear consensus among the global elite that overpopulation is the primary cause of the most important problems that our world is facing today.

Many of them are completely convinced that humans are literally a “plague” upon the Earth and that extreme measures are required to prevent us from destroying the entire planet
To the elite, everything from global warming to our growing economic problems can be directly traced back to a lack of population control. They warn that if nothing is done about our exploding population, humanity will be facing a future full of poverty, war and suffering on a filthy, desolate planet. 

They complain that it “costs too much” to keep elderly patients that are terminally ill alive, and they eagerly promote “family planning” in developing nations as a way to combat population growth. 

 Of course just about anything that reduces the human population in any way is a positive thing for those that believe in this philosophy.

 This very twisted philosophy is being promoted in our movies, in our television shows, in our music, in countless books, on many of our most prominent websites, and it is being taught at top colleges and universities all over the world. The people that are promoting this philosophy have very, very deep pockets, and they are actually convinced that they are helping to “save the world” by controlling the growth of the human population.

From the time of Charles Darwin all the way to today, we have been relentlessly warned about what would happen if something was not done to reduce population growth.
Of course the dire consequences that we were warned about have never actually come to fruition.
But that hasn’t stopped the elite from continuing to issue even more warnings.
The following are 47 shocking population control quotes from the global elite that will make you want to lose your lunch…

1. Charles Darwin: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

2. Bill Gates: “The problem is that the population is growing the fastest where people are less able to deal with it. So it’s in the very poorest places that you’re going to have a tripling in population by

2050. (…) And we’ve got to make sure that we help out with the tools now so that they don’t have an impossible situation later.”

3. John D. Rockefeller: “The population problem must be recognized by government as a principal element in long-range planning.”

4. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

5. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class”

6. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

7. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving—that’s what I’m for. . . . It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”

8. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now”

9. Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson: “The primary challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our species itself…It is time we had a grown-up discussion about the optimum quantity of human beings in this country and on this planet…All the evidence shows that we can help reduce population growth, and world poverty, by promoting literacy and female emancipation and access to birth control.”

10. Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder: “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

11. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “Solving the population problem is not going to solve the problems of racism… of sexism… of religious intolerance… of war… of gross economic

inequality. But if you don’t solve the population problem, you’re not going to solve any of those problems. Whatever problem you’re interested in, you’re not going to solve it unless you also solve the population problem.”

12. Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind homes, never mind roads, hospitals and schools.”

13. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.”

14. Al Gore: “One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the

population, and one of the principal ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children to have, the spacing of the children… You have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.”

15. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”

16. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.”

17. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.”

18. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I have two grandchildren and I want them to inherit a stable Earth. But I fear for them. Humans have overpopulated the Earth and in the process have created an ideal nutritional substrate on which bacteria and viruses (microbes) will grow and prosper. We are behaving like bacteria growing on an agar plate, flourishing until natural limits are reached or until another microbe colonizes and takes over, using them as their resource. In addition to our extremely high population density, we are social and mobile, exactly the conditions that favor growth and spread of pathogenic (disease-causing) microbes. I believe it is only a matter of time until microbes once again assert control over our population, since we are unwilling to control it ourselves. This idea has been espoused by ecologists for at least four decades and is nothing new. People just don’t want to hear it.”

19. Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General from 1997-2006: “The idea that population growth guarantees a better life — financially or otherwise — is a myth that only those who sell nappies, prams and the like have any right to believe.”

20. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, UN Under-Secretary-General from 2000-2010: “We cannot confront the massive challenges of poverty, hunger, disease and environmental destruction unless we address issues of population and reproductive health.”

21. Bill Nye: “In 1750, there were about a billion humans in the world. Now, there are well over seven billion people in the world. It

more than doubled in my lifetime. So all these people trying to live the way we live in the developed world is filling the atmosphere with a great deal more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases than existed a couple of centuries ago. It’s the speed at which it is changing that is going to be troublesome for so many large populations of humans around the world.”

22. Actress Cameron Diaz: “I think women are afraid to say that they don’t want children because they’re going to get shunned. But I think that’s changing too now. I have more girlfriends who don’t have kids than those that do. And, honestly? We don’t need any more kids. We have plenty of people on this planet.”

23. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”

24. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.”

25. Stephen Hawking: “In the last 200 years the population of our planet has grown exponentially, at a rate of 1.9 per cent per year. If it continued at this rate, with the population doubling every 40 years, by 2600 we would all be standing literally shoulder to shoulder.”

26. Gloria Steinem: “Everybody with a womb doesn’t have to have a child any more than everybody with vocal chords has to be an opera singer.”

27. Jane Goodall: “It’s our population growth that underlies just about every single one of the problems that we’ve inflicted on the planet. If there were just a few of us, then the nasty things we do wouldn’t really matter and Mother Nature would take care of it — but there are so many of us.”

28. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

29. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

30. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.”

31. Paul Ehrlich: “Basically, then, there are only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a ‘birth rate solution,’ in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The other is a ‘death rate solution,’ in which ways to raise the death rate — war, famine, pestilence — find us.”

32. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics: “[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

33. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

34. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child,

despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.”

35. Another quote from John Holdren: “If population control measures are not initiated immediately and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come.”

36. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

37. Maurice Strong: “Either we reduce the world’s population voluntarily or nature will do this for us, but brutally.”

38. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”

39. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

40. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

41. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die”

42. Author Dan Brown: “Overpopulation is an issue so profound that all of us need to ask what should be done.”

43. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”

44. Ashley Judd: “It’s unconscionable to breed, with the number of children who are starving to death in impoverished countries.”

45. John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”

46. Bill Gates: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”

47. Charles Darwin: “With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical

men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.” 

ZeroHedge

IN the NEWS - Path to Freedomless Democracies

Q: What does the LEFT deem "

misinformation"?

A: Anything that deviates or challenges their "narrative".

Q: How might these policies be used during the Mark of the Beast Controversy when it arises?

And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? Revelation 13:4

---The Western World is in the Path to Freedomless Democracies

"Religious groups and the human rights commissioner say Australia's Labor's proposed Bill to combat misinformation and disinformation would threaten freedom of expression and 'undermine democracy'. 

The Coalition has strongly opposed the Bill, which aims to protect online users from misinformation and disinformation, but which the Opposition says it is an attack on free speech.
The misinformation of today may be proven to be correct tomorrow, or new information may come to displace the incumbent orthodoxies of the day. This is the process of progress.
ACL chief executive Michelle Pearse said the Bill's provisions that would protect religious vilification were 'an over-reaction to censor contrary opinions'." 

DailyMail

IN the NEWS - 1st Amendment Under Open Assault: Q: How might it Play Out in End Times?

And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God. Romans 12:2

"The former secretary of the U.S. Department of State made the bold

declaration last Wednesday, during a session of the World Economic Forum focused on “green energy”. 

Kerry’s remarks came in response to an audience member who asked what the federal government can do to push back against those who call the legitimacy of climate change into question. His response:

“You know, there’s a lot of discussion now about how you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you’re going to have some accountability on facts, etcetera,” he said. “But look, if people only go to one source, and the source they go to is sick, and, you know, has an agenda, and they’re putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence.”

The problems posed by the freedom of speech (First Amendment) and freedom of the press, Kerry argued, are unique to democratic systems because there is no singular “truth arbiter.” He suggested that should be the role of the federal government, led by the Democratic Party.

But free speech is not a threat to the public good. Would-be tyrants like Kerry — who want to control everything we do and never face criticism— are a real threat. Listen to this,
“By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation [the United States] will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near” (Testimonies for the Church 5:451).

These are the very people the founders gave us the First Amendment to protect us from." 

Fulcrum7

Health Note - WAR against Health

Beloved, 

I wish above all things that thou mayest ...be in health... 

3 John 1:2

"RFK Jr.'s push to "Make America Healthy Again" by breaking the

grip of the processed food industry's control of the nation's food supply chain must have angered big food. 

That's because shortly after, the response was Time gaslighting readers into believing ultra-processed foods are safe.

Just days after Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vocal critic of ultra-processed foods, endorsed former President Donald Trump to promote the "Make America Healthy Again" agenda, Time Magazine—a publication not to be taken seriously—published this...Time published the initial headline, "What if Ultra-Processed Foods Aren't as Bad as You Think?"

'Trust the science' journos at the left-leaning media outlet probably changed the headline after the uproar on X.

James Lindsay, a mathematician turned culture critic and author of the website New Discourses, pointed out on X, "I am once again reminding you that Time Magazine is owned by Marc Benioff, who is closely tied to the World Economic Forum and its agendas."

Q: What could those WEF agendas be? 

A: Well, for one, the elites at WEF have pushed to reset the food supply chain for 'sustainable' reasons and implement insect diets worldwide. 

Also, these elites have a fascination for banning cow fluctuance and eventually force the world to eat printed meat from a lab. Furthermore, governments across the West have waged war against small farms...

Here's an excerpt from Time's reporting:

"A weird thing happened. Wilson found that she had more energy and less anxiety. She didn't need as much coffee to get through the day and felt more motivated. She felt better eating an ultra-processed diet than she had before, a change she attributes to taking in more calories by eating full meals, instead of haphazard combinations of whole-food ingredients." 

ZeroHedge

IN the NEWS - Push for new Global Religious text via AI

Shall a man make gods unto himself, 

and they are no gods? 

Jeremiah 16:20

“In the future, we might see the first cults and religions in history whose revered texts were written by a non-human intelligence,”  Harari said. “This was never true before. Of course, religions throughout history claimed that their holy books were written by unknown human intelligence, by a non-human entity”.

“This could become true very, very quickly, with far-reaching

consequences. In a few years there might be religions that are actually correct,” Harari said.”Just think about a religion whose holy book is written by an AI. That could be a reality in a few years.”

Harari explained that this was an unprecedented possibility.
“It’s the first technology ever that can create new ideas,” he said. “You know, the printing press, radio, television, they broadcast, they spread the ideas created by the human brain, by the human mind. They cannot create a new idea. You know, [Johannes] Gutenberg printed the Bible in the middle of the 15th century; the printing press printed as many copies of the Bible as Gutenberg instructed it, but it did not create a single new page. It had no ideas of its own about the Bible: Is it good? Is it bad? How to interpret this? How to interpret that?”

His vision of an AI-generated religion is grimly dystopian with AI religion used as a form of mind control.
“For thousands of years, prophets and poets and politicians have

used language and storytelling in order to manipulate and to control people and to reshape society,” he said, according to the paper. “Now AI is likely to be able to do it. And once it can, it doesn’t need to send killer robots to shoot us. It can get humans to pull the trigger....Contrary to what some conspiracy theories assume, you don’t really need to implant chips in people’s brains in order to control them or to manipulate them,” Harari noted." 

Israel365

IN the NEWS - Mind Control (Literally)

Q: How long before this technology will one day be used by men on earth for nefarious purposes?

The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? Jeremiah 17:9

"Scientists have been able to conduct “mind control” remotely in an incredible world-first experiment.

Now, however, an experiment involving mice has shown how the change of a magnetic field was able to alter the behavior of animals fitted with special “switches” inside their brains.

At the change of the magnetic field, mice were able to be told to feed, socialize with others and act with maternal instincts as researchers targeted areas of the brain associated with these actions.

Researchers from the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) and Yonsei University in South Korea have engineered mice that have nanoparticle-activated “switches” inside their brains.
The technology has been dubbed “Nano-MIND” and combines genetics, nanoparticles, and magnetic fields. It allows researchers to remotely activate circuits of the brain.

It is hoped the groundbreaking technology could provide future treatments for disorders that affect emotions, social behaviors and appetite.
Jinwoo Cheon, senior author and director of the IBS Center for Nanomedicine, explained: “This is the world's first technology to freely control specific brain regions using magnetic fields.” 

Indy100

IN the NEWS - AI to Raise the Dead?

AI can not actually raise the dead. An AI generated person is just that----generated by AI based in info plugged into a computer generated body.

For the living know that they shall die: 

but the dead know not any thing. 

Ecclesiastes 9:5

"A tech expert with a track record of predicting sea changes in the industry has made several eye-popping new forecasts in a new book.
Google’s Ray Kurzweil famously predicted the iPhone era and the fact that a computer would beat someone at chess by 1998.

In his new book, 'The Singularity is Nearer’, Kurzweil predicts that humans fully merge with AI, becoming immortal cyborgs, by 2045.
Kurzweil believes that AI technology holds the promise to ‘bring back’ the dead - at first in the form of simulations which replicate a person, then physically back to life.
By the end of the 2020s, Kurzweil expects ‘highly realistic’ non-biological recreations of people - and then living bodies.
He writes: ‘Eventually replicants may even be housed in cybernetically augmented biological bodies grown from the DNA of the original person.’
Kurzweil predicts that humans will move into artificial bodies ‘more advanced than what biology allows’ - and that by the 2040s, it will be possible to make a copy of a person." DailyMail

IN the NEWS - Starmer: Keep your Religion to yourself PLEASE

I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Galatians 1:6
You know the cliche when in the public arena----"keep your religion to yourself". Maybe Starmer should do that. He should keep his Green Religion to himself....not force it onto the country of Britain.
In this election year in America we hear warnings of so-called "Christian Nationalism" (which doesn't really exist except among the small group of Domnionists among the NAR movement of the Charismatics).

The real concern should be about the alliance of the Green Religion (which is very friendly towards the Papal Laudato Si' which calls for Sunday as a day to honor mother earth by reducing our so-called carbon footprint and honor Father God with the Eucharist) and the state----an easy way for the secular and "Christian" to find common ground on setting aside a day as a counterfeit Sabbath.

"Labour Party leader Sir Kier Starmer is one of the least known political figures to ascend to the top job in Britain in recent memory, apparently making the calculation to step back and let the Conservatives self-immolate.... joined the Labour Party Young Socialists at the age of 16 and would go on to serve as the editor of the Trotskyist magazine Socialist Alternatives, which sought to advance the aims of International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency (IRMT) in the United Kingdom. The IRMT was founded by Greek

Trotskyite Michel Pablo and sought to advance a “red-green” form of communism, combining far-left economics with the environmentalist movement.

It is unsurprising, therefore, that Starmer has made the green agenda a central piece of his platform, vowing to achieve “Net Zero” carbon emissions in the UK by the end of the decade, a goal that would drastically transform the British economy and likely make the country poorer and more dependent on foreign energy imports to survive economically.

The Labour Party leader has also tried to downplay his well-to-do upbringing in the affluent London suburb of Oxted. Starmer has often made bones about his father being a “toolmaker” to

demonstrate his working-class roots, however, his father, Rodney, was actually the owner of a toolmaking factory, rather than being a labourer as Starmer seemed to imply.

Starmer was also privately educated at the Reigate Grammar School before studying law at Oxford University...... on the issue of gender, with Starmer initially saying that some women could have penises — a position held by much of his progressive metropolitan base — before later backtracking as the election loomed to declare that women were, in fact, “adult females“." 

Breitbart

"Most recently, in a meeting held at the Vatican with the world’s top bankers, Francis made this impassioned appeal: ”First, I invite you to place the environment and the earth at the center of your attention

and responsibility. We are in a time of serious environmental crisis, which depends on many actors and factors, including the economic and business choices of yesterday and today. It is no longer enough to comply with the laws of states, which proceed too slowly: we need to innovate by anticipating the future, with courageous and far-sighted choices that can be imitated. The innovation of the entrepreneur today must first and foremost be innovation in caring for the common home”. 

Essentially, the pope admonished the world’s leading bankers that all their activities must be in accordance with his plan for the common good of humanity, with his climate change agenda as the focus.
These initiatives and other activities in which the pontiff and his church are engaged are coalescing into the worldwide legal implementation of Sunday sacredness, which the Roman church claims as her mark of ecclesiastical authority." 

AdventMessenger

IN the NEWS - Car Free Sundays

I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Galatians 1:6

"National Today is a news media company that tracks all the special holidays and events around the world. National Today just announced that the International Car-Free Sunday celebration will be held on Sunday, September 22, 2024. 

Sponsoring this kind of global event on Sunday serves two purposes. First, it establishes a global forum for community action aimed at promoting more sustainable car and transportation habits. 

Secondly, it designates Sunday as the official day to sponsor these kinds of leisurely activities due to the fact that so many people already see Sunday as the collective day of rest.

National Today published the following about Car-Free Sunday 2024:
• “Car-Free Sunday has its origins from when the Environmental Transport Association (ETA) set the inaugural annual Car-Free Day on the first Tuesday in their Green Transport Week, which was sometime around 17 June. In 2000, the agreement was made for it to be a self-standing day held on September 22 — originally as a pan-European day — organized under the sponsorship of the European Commission. It was later expanded globally — during this time, a large number of cities around the world were invited to close their centers to cars. Pedestrians, cyclists, and other forms of sustainable transportation were encouraged instead.”
• “The idea behind Car-Free Sunday is to do without your car that whole day. You can cycle or take another means of sustainable transportation instead.”

One thing is certain: the idea that Sundays are for the environment is becoming increasingly popular. How popular is it? It has become so popular that on September 22, 2024, 100 million people will join in on Car-Free Sunday. How can anyone deny that Sunday rest and ecological sustainability are being aligned together—hand in hand—in today’s society?

“In free America, rulers and legislators, in order to secure public favor, will yield to the popular demand for a law enforcing Sunday observance” (Great Controversy, p. 592)."
Advent Messenger

IN the NEWS - "Earth Sabbath"?

I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Galatians 1:6

"Earth Sabbath is a climate advocacy group that is seeking to implement a day of rest for the environment. They just produced another video calling upon people to heed Pope Francis’ call to protect the environment by having a day of rest. In the video, 

Earth Sabbath praises Pope Francis for his leadership in the climate movement and attributes the idea of a weekly day of rest for the environment to Laudato Si’.

The video highlights the following:
• “Pope Francis has been a powerful voice calling for immediate action. Perhaps the action needed is a weekly Earth Sabbath.”

• “The concept of a weekly Earth Sabbath was introduced in his encyclical Laudato Si’.”
• “The pope has met with world leaders, urging binding climate targets.”
• “Pope Francis has called for a phase-out of coal, oil, and gas.”
• “At the UN climate change conference, the pope urged decisive action.”
• “Pope Francis urged world leaders to end divisions and unite."
• “The time for action is now. We must heed the Pope’s call.”
• “It’s time for everyone to put into action the keeping of a weekly earth Sabbath.”

What we are seeing here is a dangerous mixing of politics and religion with the goal of bringing people together to work collectively on environmental issues. The foundation of this movement will be Sunday. This is a call to implement the policies of Laudato Si’, including a day of rest for the earth." 

AdventMessenger

Papal Notes - Little Horn Entity Calls for a UNIVERSAL APPROACH

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. 2 Timothy 4:3-4

"On May 16, 2024, Pope Francis turned up the climate rhetoric at the Vatican during a global gathering of scientists, experts, and

government leaders, including six US governors. During his speech, the Pope emphasized the importance of “adopting universal” and “rapid” climate policies “capable of effecting changes and political decisions.” He stressed the importance of acting with “urgency, urgency!” The Pope added that failure to act was considered a sin against God and a violation of international law.

The Vatican Press Office reported the following words spoken by Pope Francis:
• “I am pleased to welcome you, the members of the Pontifical Academies of Science and the Social Sciences. I greet the President and all the guests, mayors and governors coming from various parts of the world for this Summit on the theme, From Climate Crisis to

Climate Resilience.”
• “The destruction of the environment is an offense against God, a sin that is not only personal but also structural, one that greatly endangers all human beings, .... and threatens to unleash a conflict between generations.”
• “First, there is a need to adopt a universal approach and a rapid and resolute activity capable of effecting changes and political decisions.”
• “The climate crisis requires a synergy of cooperation and global solidarity. This effort must be symphonic, carried out harmoniously by everyone together."

Pope Francis is unwavering in his prophetic mission. 

He is doing everything he can to pass the legal framework and persuade governments to adopt his climate solutions through regulations and legislation." 

AdventMessenger