"The problem is that no known general principle can“… explain how to match blueprints viewed as typographic objects and the things they are supposed to control. The only example we have of such a situation is the attempt to build self-adapting programs by workers in the field of artificial intelligence. Their experience is
quite conclusive … without some built-in matching, nothing
interesting can occur. Thus … there is a considerable gap in the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution, and we believe this gap to be of such a nature that it cannot be bridged within the current conception of biology.
Proverbs 1:23
quite conclusive … without some built-in matching, nothing
interesting can occur. Thus … there is a considerable gap in the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution, and we believe this gap to be of such a nature that it cannot be bridged within the current conception of biology.
Schützenberger also documented the existence of major gaps in the current evolution theory, namely the problem of the enormous number of beneficial random mutations and
massive selection that are required for evolution to occur,
noting that
“... it is clear that even on the most schematic models
the number of cycles involved is truly enormous. Thus,
when we reach the level of 10 1000
, whether or not we take
a few square roots makes little difference.”
When a computer program simulation
designed to research evolution is modified by
simulated mutations
“... it just jams ... . Thus no selection
effected on the final output (if any!) would
induce a drift, however slow, of the system
toward the production of this mechanism if
it were not already present in some form.
Further, there is no chance (<10
-1000)
to see this mechanism appear spontaneously and, if it did, even less for it to remain.”
This is another crucial argument against
Darwinism.”
CMI
....but a man of understanding hath wisdom. Proverbs 1:23