"Darwinists simply have no evidence that morphology is reducible to DNA.
Where differences are greatest between chimps and humans, (andbetween all other creatures), are not in the genetic sequences, but are instead found in alternative splicing patterns.
As the following paper states, “A major question in vertebrate evolutionary biology is “how do physical and behavioral differences arise if we have a very similar set of genes to that of the mouse, chicken, or frog?”,,
In fact, due to alternative splicing, “Alternatively spliced isoforms,,, appear to
In fact, due to alternative splicing, “Alternatively spliced isoforms,,, appear to
--behave as if encoded by distinct genes
--rather than as minor variants of each other.,,,”
and “As many as 100,000 distinct isoform transcripts could be produced from the 20,000 human protein-coding genes (Pan et al., 2008), collectively leading to perhaps over a million distinct polypeptides obtained by post-translational modification of products of all possible transcript isoforms."
This finding is simply completely devastating to the reductive materialistic presuppositions of Darwinists.
This finding is simply completely devastating to the reductive materialistic presuppositions of Darwinists.
Thus in conclusion, the evidence from population genetics, as well as the genetic evidence itself, simply does not line up with Darwinian presuppositions."
Uncommondescent
Uncommondescent
In other words---you're NOT related to a Common Beast of the Field