I have seen the foolish taking root:
Job 5:3
Is Mr. Dawkins an intellectual dwarf? I'm being SERIOUS.... read below his quote...."All appearances to the contrary, the only watchmaker in nature is the blind forces of physics, albeit deployed in a very special way. (Uhm, who did the deploying? How did they wind up in an organized fashion?) A true watchmaker has foresight: (With all due respect-doesn't this undermine your argument?) he designs his cogs and springs, and plans their interconnections, with a future purpose in his mind's eye. Natural selection, the blind, unconscious automatic process which Darwin discovered, and which we now know is the explanation for the existence and apparently purposeful form of all life, has no purpose in mind. (Huh? Did you just contradict yourself? If a "true watchmaker" = foresight & design with purpose---but you admit "natural selection" doesn't do that, yet we have an "apparently purposeful form", ---did you not just contradict yourself?)It has no mind and no mind's eye. It does not plan for the future. It has no vision, no foresight, no sight at all. If it can be said to play the role of watchmaker in nature, it is the blind watchmaker."
The Blind Watchmaker p.5 Richard Dawkins
How does Mr. Dawkins get taken serious by anybody?
"has no purpose in mind", Huh?
Looks like purposeful DESIGN to me...
dawkins is BLIND...