"The rule that science refuse teleology seems, therefore, less a
requirement of science as such than a logical consequence of materialism: if materialism is true, then no fundamental or real teleology can exist in nature for science to study; instead, any teleology or intelligence in nature must result from underlying nonteleological processes.
The question therefore arises
Q: whether nature, conceived in purely material terms, possesses the ability to create all the information that we find in it?" William Dembski, Being as Communion (2014), pp49-50
A: NO
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible...
Colossians 1:16
requirement of science as such than a logical consequence of materialism: if materialism is true, then no fundamental or real teleology can exist in nature for science to study; instead, any teleology or intelligence in nature must result from underlying nonteleological processes.
The question therefore arises
Q: whether nature, conceived in purely material terms, possesses the ability to create all the information that we find in it?" William Dembski, Being as Communion (2014), pp49-50
A: NO
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible...
Colossians 1:16