"Hubble makes surprising find in the early universe (NASA Hubble Space Telescope).
The first atoms had to form, then clump together, then form stars, then galaxies.
This is known as cosmic evolution, and stellar evolution, and galactic evolution.
It was so Darwinian; simple to complex, gradually over billions of
years. The first stars needed to be composed of almost pure hydrogen – the so-called Population III stars, theoretical but necessary for the theory to be plausible.
The “Pop III” stars* were supposed to blow up in supernovas, and seed the galaxies with the first heavy elements.
---NASA’s announcement moves the “bang” from the big bang to the theory itself. It’s blowing up! Listen to the big fail:
The Big Bang was only supposed to produce hydrogen, with small amounts of helium and lithium. Elements up to iron could be cooked inside stellar cores over millions of years, but all the higher elements above iron had to be formed in supernovas. Now what are theorists going to do? They were wrong – there is no evidence for hydrogen stars!
Instant stars?
It cannot be.
--According to Big Bang theorists, stars needed time to grow. The first atoms had to form, then clump together, then form stars, then galaxies.
This is known as cosmic evolution, and stellar evolution, and galactic evolution.
It was so Darwinian; simple to complex, gradually over billions of
The “Pop III” stars* were supposed to blow up in supernovas, and seed the galaxies with the first heavy elements.
---NASA’s announcement moves the “bang” from the big bang to the theory itself. It’s blowing up! Listen to the big fail:
New results from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope suggest the formation of the first stars and galaxies in the early universe took place sooner than previously thought. A European team of astronomers have found no evidence of the first generation of stars, known as Population III stars, as far back as when the universe was just 500 million years old.This really messes things up.
The exploration of the very first galaxies remains a significant challenge in modern astronomy. We do not know when or how the first stars and galaxies in the universe formed.
The Big Bang was only supposed to produce hydrogen, with small amounts of helium and lithium. Elements up to iron could be cooked inside stellar cores over millions of years, but all the higher elements above iron had to be formed in supernovas. Now what are theorists going to do? They were wrong – there is no evidence for hydrogen stars!
“These results have profound astrophysical consequences as they show that galaxies must have formed much earlier than we thought,” said Bhatawdekar….In any other occupation, workers who fail this spectacularly would be fired and ashamed. Scientists have a bad habit of covering their failures with the announcement that they are “excited” to be wrong. “This leaves an exciting area of further research for the upcoming NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope — to study the universe’s earliest galaxies.” If the Webb telescope doesn’t find them, will they finally have to admit that it looks like creation, not evolution?
These results also suggest that the earliest formation of stars and galaxies occurred much earlier than can be probed with the Hubble Space Telescope.
*Population III stars were named according to historical traditions. “Population I” are metal-rich stars (where ‘metal’ is astronomer lingo for elements heavier than helium). “Population II” stars are metal-poor. Theoretical Population III stars are supposed to be pure hydrogen, with no heavy elements."
CEH ...he made the stars also. Genesis 1:16
