"Dinosaurs could hold key to cancer discoveries (Anglia Ruskin University, 29 May 2025). Here is another major admission that original soft tissue in dinosaur bones is real (see 20 March 2025). This one contains a new escape hatch. Instead of admitting a colossal failure of deep time—instead of admitting that dinosaur bones are only thousands of years old, not millions—these evolutionists distract attention from their devastating error by saying that the soft tissue might provide clues for cancer research! Buried in the press release, though, is this admission of surprise:
"The researchers discovered red blood cell-like structures in a fossil.jpg)
while studying a Telmatosaurus transsylvanicus, a duck-billed, plant eating “marsh lizard” that lived between 66-70 million years ago in the Hateg Basin in present-day Romania. The new study used Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) techniques to identify low-density structures resembling erythrocytes, or red blood cells, in the fossilised bone. The findings raise the possibility that soft tissue and cellular components are more commonly preserved in ancient remains than previously thought."
.jpg)
Q: Any apologies from the consensus for being so wrong?"
CEH
