And spared not the old world,
but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;2 Peter 2:5
Oh, I see, it's O.K. when evolutionists use the idea of a "Flood" to explain the earth's geological record...
"Another attempt to explain the Cambrian explosion proposes a global flood that tapped the capacity of simple animals to evolve new body plans suddenly.
... evolutionists have come up with several ad hoc mechanisms or question-begging arguments to tap dance around the Cambrian explosion (the sudden appearance of nearly all the animal phyla in a geological instant).
Another creative explanation sounds almost Biblical. Writing for the New York Times, Carl Zimmer described a global catastrophe that, rather than killing off life, enabled it to evolve. Leaning on the ideas of Paul Smith (Oxford U) and David Harper (U of Durham), the ones who hypothesized a “combo plate” model for causes of the explosion, Zimmer invoked a global flood:
flood as one possible abiotic process for the explosion, on their combo plate of possible causes:
The paper by Peters and Gaines they referenced, from Nature in 2012, uses the Great Unconformity as evidence of a global flood, although they did not use the phrase “global flood.” Instead, they referred to “widespread continental denudation during the Neoproterozoic followed by extensive physical reworking of soil, regolith and basement rock during the first continental-scale marine transgression of the Phanerozoic.”
It’s not clear from the Nature paper whether the authors believe all the high mountains on Earth were covered by water. Suffice it to say, though, that they proposed that the denudation was continental in scope and had global consequences on the ocean and on life.
Additionally, they pointed to the fact that the Great Unconformity itself is global: it “can be traced across Laurentia and globally, including Gondwana, Baltica, Avalonia and Siberia, making it the most widely recognized and distinctive stratigraphic surface in the rock record.”
What’s striking is that creationists also look at the Great Unconformity as evidence for a global flood. They also believe, like Smith and Harper, that the flood involved “extensive erosion and mobilization of weathered rock and regolith”. Two major differences would be the timing of the flood (as well as its mechanism) and the emplacement of the fossil record as a consequence.
The evolutionists’ problems with the Cambrian explosion are far worse than they imagine. Still, it’s kind of funny when they take “global flood” out of the creationists’ explanatory toolkit and use it to try to unscrew the Darwin nut." CEH
but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;2 Peter 2:5
Oh, I see, it's O.K. when evolutionists use the idea of a "Flood" to explain the earth's geological record...
"Another attempt to explain the Cambrian explosion proposes a global flood that tapped the capacity of simple animals to evolve new body plans suddenly.
... evolutionists have come up with several ad hoc mechanisms or question-begging arguments to tap dance around the Cambrian explosion (the sudden appearance of nearly all the animal phyla in a geological instant).
Another creative explanation sounds almost Biblical. Writing for the New York Times, Carl Zimmer described a global catastrophe that, rather than killing off life, enabled it to evolve. Leaning on the ideas of Paul Smith (Oxford U) and David Harper (U of Durham), the ones who hypothesized a “combo plate” model for causes of the explosion, Zimmer invoked a global flood:
But those genes evolved in bilaterians tens of millions of years before the Cambrian explosion put them to the test, notes Dr. Smith. “They had the capacity,”
he said, “but it hadn’t been expressed yet.”
It took a global flood to tap that capacity, Dr. Smith and Dr. Harper propose.
They base their proposal on a study published last year by Shanan Peters of the University of Wisconsin and Robert Gaines of Pomona College.
They offered evidence that the Cambrian Explosion was preceded by a rise in sea level that submerged vast swaths of land, eroding the drowned rocks.
Here’s how their paper in Science, “Causes of the Cambrian Explosion,” mentioned the big  |
| Here's your BIG FLOOD |
Major sea-level rise in the early, but not earliest, Cambrian led to the flooding of these interiors and triggered a range of Earth system responses, including the extensive erosion and mobilization of weathered rock and regolith and the rapid input of calcium, phosphate, and other ions into the oceans. Calcium concentrations in seawater increased almost threefold in the early Cambrian, and this input may have directly facilitated the origin of biomineralization. The input of phosphate provided simultaneous nutrient flux to shallow-water areas.
It’s not clear from the Nature paper whether the authors believe all the high mountains on Earth were covered by water. Suffice it to say, though, that they proposed that the denudation was continental in scope and had global consequences on the ocean and on life.
Additionally, they pointed to the fact that the Great Unconformity itself is global: it “can be traced across Laurentia and globally, including Gondwana, Baltica, Avalonia and Siberia, making it the most widely recognized and distinctive stratigraphic surface in the rock record.”
What’s striking is that creationists also look at the Great Unconformity as evidence for a global flood. They also believe, like Smith and Harper, that the flood involved “extensive erosion and mobilization of weathered rock and regolith”. Two major differences would be the timing of the flood (as well as its mechanism) and the emplacement of the fossil record as a consequence.
The evolutionists’ problems with the Cambrian explosion are far worse than they imagine. Still, it’s kind of funny when they take “global flood” out of the creationists’ explanatory toolkit and use it to try to unscrew the Darwin nut." CEH