...and there is no new thing under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9
"The big picture conclusions of all studies is that evolutionary processes are only capable of driving changes at the level of species and genera, (in other words genetic variation within a kind based on pre-programmed data--known as "micro-evolution") but not at the level of families or higher (in other words no "evolution" into another separate, distinct creature, known as "macro-evolution").
Stated differently, evolution produces a limited number of changes and then no further significant change is possible.
For instance, the adaptations seen in the cichlid fish in Lake Victoria closely match those seen in the cichlid fish in the other lakes. The same limited number of changes repeated themselves over and over.
In addition, all modifications represent minor alterations of the same cichlid body plan.
The evidence commonly cited to argue for evolution’s ability to drive large-scale transformations is almost always circular.
Biologists regularly identify similarities and differences between two groups and then assume those differences are the result of natural selection, mutations, and related processes. However, this conclusion is not based on any actual hard evidence. It is simply assumed."
EN&V
"The big picture conclusions of all studies is that evolutionary processes are only capable of driving changes at the level of species and genera, (in other words genetic variation within a kind based on pre-programmed data--known as "micro-evolution") but not at the level of families or higher (in other words no "evolution" into another separate, distinct creature, known as "macro-evolution").
Stated differently, evolution produces a limited number of changes and then no further significant change is possible.
For instance, the adaptations seen in the cichlid fish in Lake Victoria closely match those seen in the cichlid fish in the other lakes. The same limited number of changes repeated themselves over and over.
In addition, all modifications represent minor alterations of the same cichlid body plan.
The evidence commonly cited to argue for evolution’s ability to drive large-scale transformations is almost always circular.
Biologists regularly identify similarities and differences between two groups and then assume those differences are the result of natural selection, mutations, and related processes. However, this conclusion is not based on any actual hard evidence. It is simply assumed."
EN&V