"The authors of a new paper in Nature Nanotechnology commit the fallacy right in the title:
"Evolution of a designless nanoparticle network into reconfigurable Boolean logic."
* If it's reconfigurable, it's not designless.
"Evolution of a designless nanoparticle network into reconfigurable Boolean logic."
* If it's reconfigurable, it's not designless.
* If they "evolved" it to do logic,
it's illogical to call it Darwinian,
which they say inspired their approach.
* If they applied their minds
to exploit the physical properties
of particles for a purpose,
then they circumvented the
purposelessness of natural selection."
EV&V
He taketh the wise in their own craftiness:
Job 5:13